... as if being trained to treat the ailments of the human body makes one qualified to discuss the ramifications of PC performance.
AFAIK, He never claimed it did. IIRC, Tom was still a medical student when he first started his hobby site; nobody expected it to take off as
a business in its own right. His status as a doctor is irrelevant, what
made it an interesting gimmick for his site in the early days was the
idea that someone outside the normal geek circles would be interested
in motherboards, CPUs, memory and the sort. And there was the
implication (in those days) that a "scientifically inclined" person like
a doctor would make for a good evaluator.
Most viewers forget that being a Doctor does not automatically make you
any better with common sense or the scientific method than the average
college graduate.
The problem is now it is too hard to distinguish Tom Pabst the hobbyist
from
Tom's Hardware the site, even for Tom himself.
I'm not sure he understands the difference between an editorial and
a rant. Both have thier place, but not in the same column.
As for Van Smith, I don't have enough experience to speak about the
person, but I saw many similarities in posting style between him and
Tom (a comparison I don't think either would be flattered by).
I didn't much care for his site design either, but FWIW, it looks like it
became popular enough to exceed its costs. The August 26th news
says he's shutting down (or at least not updating the site further).