Is there a difference? :rofl:
Yeah, about 1200 of them.
Potentially something to replace my RX-100 MkII. I don't see Canon trying to double the price of the II with the III to equal the RX-100 MkVISo what are you expecting from a Mark III, a lower price on a II?
It's getting closer... https://www.canonrumors.com/is-this-the-canon-powershot-g7-x-mark-iii/So what are you expecting from a Mark III, a lower price on a II?
No idea. I didn't have a viewfinder on my S90 or the RX-100 Mk2 and haven't had any issues or considered it to be a problem.
7 Months later, but the G7 X Mark III supposedly going to be announced on 7/10 along with the G5 X Mark II. The G7 X Mark III is supposed to be $749 and the G5 X Mark II is supposed to be $899.
So they arrived last night. They have uncropped 4k video, but the quality is terrible. The footage is really soft. It looks like 720p that's been scaled up (not that well either).
Yes, it has a stacked Sony sensor. I think the Sony RX100 Mk VI is too expensive, and I'm not real keen on the lens zoom range and resulting apertures. The RX100 Mk VA is also pricey, and is a bit short on zoom. I was hoping the G7X Mk III would be the camera I was looking for with a lens between the two and a lower price. It seems like the video performance on the G7X Mk III is going to be wanting. I'm a bit hung up on spending $750 on a pocket camera that has weak video.
I'll presume you meant Olympus. What model are you thinking of? System sounds like detachable lenses which means it's not going to fit in a pocket.
$1200 like the Mk VI was, but it seems to have some potential.
