Hopefully just hyperbole but let us know if there's anything we can do.Considering this will be my last Christmas, I wish it could have been better but that's life.
Hopefully just hyperbole but let us know if there's anything we can do.
Ham is best eaten cold and not "cooked" (warmed).Other than that, work gave me a whole leg of ham (no idea what to do with this, I suspect it's better to bake it with a glaze).
You're describing self inflicted problems that can readily solved with a little flexibility. Take your share of the money from the house and move somewhere living is actually affordable. That's not NYC. Why you would choose to be homeless in NYC instead of being comfortable elsewhere is beyond me. You can get a good house in lots of places with the amount of money you'll have with your split of the house money. They can even be warmer places with better weather.Not really. I'm stuck in a place where my life sucks, there's literally nothing I can do now to change it, and there's no future to look forward to (i.e. I'll likely be homeless after my mom dies). About three months ago I got really sick with the flu, still had to take care of my mother, and had a two month recovery before I felt completely normal.
I almost feel like starting another thread on all this, but I'm not seeing the point. There's nothing within reason anyone here can do. For starters, I'd need about half a million to buy my siblings out of their share of the house. Even though mom's will stipulates splitting everything three ways, since I've been her sole caretaker now for over 5 years you would think they would let me have the house but no. Then there's the issue of getting breaks occasionally from being a caretaker. Since she came home from rehab on January 26, 2018 I haven't had a day off. We can't afford to pay people. And I can no longer earn money, even if someone had a consulting job I could do from home. I'm just too exhausted from taking care of mom and the house to have anything left to work. That's it in a nutshell, although there are other issues as well. Basically, after all this, I seriously decided #57 will probably be my last birthday. I just have to get my affairs in order and decide how to go out. Doing something like Nicholas Cage did in Leaving Las Vegas doesn't seem bad. I have enough to buy hookers and drink myself to death.
You're describing self inflicted problems that can readily solved with a little flexibility. Take your share of the money from the house and move somewhere living is actually affordable. That's not NYC. Why you would choose to be homeless in NYC instead of being comfortable elsewhere is beyond me. You can get a good house in lots of places with the amount of money you'll have with your split of the house money. They can even be warmer places with better weather.
I'm a city person. Always have been, always will be. Either you understand that or you don't.Who said you needed to buy a car or drive? And how do you know you'll hate living someplace else? It sounds like you haven't ever tried it.
My sister is in Yaphank in Suffolk County. Middle of nowhere. Even she's bored living there but when she married her former husband wanted to buy the house there to be near his sister. Wouldn't want to live with her. It's the kind of place you run out of things to do in 3 hours. My brother is in the Rockaways. Still NYC, but not really near anything, so I really would want to live with him, either. The subway takes well over an hour to get him into Manhattan. I do make the trip in 35 or 40 minutes or less most of the time. His house is too small for two adults with lots of hobby crap to live comfortably in anyway.Further, what are your siblings going to do to you if you don't move out? They can't sell the house with you in it. You could always offer to move in with them.
Not really. I'm stuck in a place where my life sucks, there's literally nothing I can do now to change it, and there's no future to look forward to (i.e. I'll likely be homeless after my mom dies). About three months ago I got really sick with the flu, still had to take care of my mother, and had a two month recovery before I felt completely normal.
I almost feel like starting another thread on all this, but I'm not seeing the point. There's nothing within reason anyone here can do. For starters, I'd need about half a million to buy my siblings out of their share of the house. Even though mom's will stipulates splitting everything three ways, since I've been her sole caretaker now for over 5 years you would think they would let me have the house but no. Then there's the issue of getting breaks occasionally from being a caretaker. Since she came home from rehab on January 26, 2018 I haven't had a day off. We can't afford to pay people. And I can no longer earn money, even if someone had a consulting job I could do from home. I'm just too exhausted from taking care of mom and the house to have anything left to work. That's it in a nutshell, although there are other issues as well. Basically, after all this, I seriously decided #57 will probably be my last birthday. I just have to get my affairs in order and decide how to go out. Doing something like Nicholas Cage did in Leaving Las Vegas doesn't seem bad. I have enough to buy hookers and drink myself to death.
Actually, she's been stable mentally and physically for the last two years but she stabilized at a level where I have to take care of all her basic needs. That includes cooking, shopping, bathing, putting her on the toilet, getting her in bed, etc. She hasn't been able to walk without assistance since November 2017. She had a cranial hematoma which likely caused this but she was mentally going down hill since at least 2015, maybe earlier. The hematoma was fixed but the rehab place did a poor job getting her functional again. Now I need to wheel her everywhere. She's not near death or anything to be in need of a hospice. In fact, she could go on ten more years like this. Her sister is in a similar state after having a stroke at age 86. She just turned 90 in October but it doesn't look like she's going anywhere anytime soon. My mom is going to be 81 in January. I could be doing this well into my 60s, even 70s, if she lives long enough.I'm sorry that things have been so rough and your mom's health has declined so poorly. I can appreciate the loss of hope and emotions are high right now. Before my mom passed her health declined gradually to the point she no longer could speak or could walk. The timeline wasn't quite like yours but her health was failing over the course of a couple years with the last couple of months being the most heart breaking. During this time family tension was at its worst making it difficult to make large life decisions.
Is your mother in hospice? There should be some resource available through Medicaid, Medicare in your state that might help you care for you mom if her state of health is so poor. These might be able to give you the break you need to just get your head above water for a bit while you care for you mom.
Changes is really hard, harder as you get older for sure. Your mental and physical well-being are being challenged right now from all this stress and I'd hope you can seek someone local to talk to through this. What you described is a $250K inheritance which I understand doesn't suite your needs to remain in your current location but it's a considerable sum that you can draw from for a period of time while you work through the hard times after your mother has passed. Ask them for some time to sort your living situation while things are still reasonably well. Healing from the traumatic loss of will take a while but it does get easier over time. Making snap judgement calls now or immediately after the loss of your mother may put you on a course to completely alienate your remaining close family. I'd encourage you to talk to them now and explain how difficult this is and see if they can give you 12 months of no action on the house until emotions can be managed. That way there is a plan and you can reevaluate in 12 months versus going right to litigation in the heat of it all.
They could file a partition action and get a court to force the sale. The new owners could then begin the eviction process. May take a year or two depending on court workload.Who said you needed to buy a car or drive? And how do you know you'll hate living someplace else? It sounds like you haven't ever tried it.
Further, what are your siblings going to do to you if you don't move out? They can't sell the house with you in it. You could always offer to move in with them.
Problem with both those things is they just don't have the money to either miss work without pay, or pay for us to get help. They're both basically living paycheck to paycheck. As I mentioned also, neither one is physically up to the task even if they could get the time off from work. My sister had a knee replacement last year. My brother is getting a hernia repair in a few weeks. They're not candidates to lift someone multiple times per day, even someone like my mom who maybe weighs 115 pounds, give or take.Assuming they are working for a reasonably sized business with at least 50 employees and have been there for over a year, they can avail themselves of the FMLA and take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to care for your mother:
FMLA Eligibility - FindLaw
A number of factors determine whether you're eligible for FMLA coverage, including the size of the employer and how long you've been their employee. Learn about this and more at FindLaw's Family Medical Leave section.employment.findlaw.com
Surely they could at least pitch in to get a nursing aid to help out from time to time and give you a physical and mental break.
Well, that was kind of my point. It would take years.They could file a partition action and get a court to force the sale. The new owners could then begin the eviction process. May take a year or two depending on court workload.
Sorry about that. I've been meaning to post about all this for a long time. Since my holidays have been mostly shitty lately, I guess it made sense to do it in a Christmas/New Year thread./sarcasm
Jtr you killed my Merry Christmas/Happy New year thread. No worries. Your absolutely shitty situation excuses it.
tl;dr:
That has its own drawbacks which I'll explain in response to your other points.Do your research on all your options and then; HIRE A LAWYER and execute them. Don't fuck around on this. GET IT DONE in 2020. No longer talk with your siblings about your financial situation. You tried talking, they don't give a shit and they aren't going to change their minds. Go silent. Change the subject if it comes up. Don't give them any reason to think you are doing anything behind their back. They will interfere with your plans. Go completely dark.
Good that your siblings saw the light and everything was formalized. My mom made her will long before any of this happened. It hadn't entered any of our minds about her needing long-term care. In retrospect, I should have pushed her to include a clause in her will to the effect that the person providing her long-term care in her home would be entitled to more than 1/3 of the house, assuming she needed long-term care. We could have even stipulated how much extra per year the portion would be. Obviously, someone providing care for only a few weeks would be entitled to far less than someone providing care for 5 years and counting. I might have pushed for a sliding scale where the person providing care gets the entire house after 5 years. The numbers more or less seem to work out for that.I have mentioned in another thread that I'm in a very similar situation as you. I'm about 5 years younger than you with an 84 yo mother who I exclusively take care of. Fortunately she is in better physical/mental health, but that could change quickly. I have one brother and one sister. My siblings have already agreed to give me 100% of her house and this was formalized in her trust. So your situation and the various implication are of great interest to me.
Both actually. Now they're living paycheck to paycheck but the terms I offered them was to split all mom's other assets besides the house between them evenly, provided I get the house free and clear. That would come to something in excess of $100K each as of now, but could be more later depending upon how the markets do. I even offered my brother continued use of the garage for one of his cars and car parts. They could pay off most or all of the outstanding mortgages with the money, depending upon when my mom goes and how much is left to pay. That would be good enough for them to retire comfortably by their 60s. Getting another ~$250K each from the house would be fluff under those terms, in that it's nice to have, but it won't affect them detrimentally if they don't. My brother was even talking about using that money to get a second house, which is obviously fluff.You said, regarding your siblings split of your house is that, "the money will basically just be fluff to my brother and sister." You also mentioned they are living check-2-check and don't have the time, energy or will to help you with your mother. Which is it? If siblings are living check-2-check they actually could use some cash from the sale of your house.
To be fair, my brother does cook a lot of meals for my mother and tries to visit for a short time before work (he works 4PM to 12PM). That's worth something, which is why I offered him the perk of continuing to use the garage. My sister helped me clean and go through mom's clothes before she returned from rehab two years ago, but other than that, she has mostly been AWOL. Yes, she visits when she can, but given that she's 55 miles away with a full-time job and a house of her own, plus she's supporting her daughter, I don't really expect more than this. I realized given both their situations, the help they can give is limited, which is fine, but in return I should get something for my troubles. Telling me "they appreciate it" isn't enough.You also said, "they don't even think [you] should get
anything..." from the sale of the house. That's ridiculous. At best they should be looking at a 60/20/20 split if not 70/15/15 or 80/10/10 split, especially since they have done nothing (financially or "time/help" wise) to help care for your mother. Do your siblings love or care about their mother and her well being? Or are they just licking their chops at the sale of her house?
Two issues with putting the house in my name now. My mom gets a big break on the real estate taxes because she's over 65. If it goes to my name, that's about $4,000 annually more going towards real estate taxes until I turn 65, or over $30K total. That's a not insubstantial sum.The HELoC seems complicated. But if it's your only option do it. Otherwise, just get the house transferred into your name. If you have a 100% PoA then legally transfer the house and any other assets into you name. EVERYTHING. Do it now. Don't tell ANYBODY you are doing it. Just do it and get it done. Then don't tell anybody till after your mothers passing.
Strictly speaking, my brother and sister have nothing to do with the house besides the will. There should be no need to notify them.---note: I don't know the legal aspects of not mentioning the asset transfer. Your lawyer may notify all parties after the transfer so they have a chance to legally respond. I don't know for sure.---
Here's the irony. We actually all get along pretty well other than on this one issue. I don't really discuss it with them any more. I'm not thrilled about the lack of help I'm getting but I see things from their point of view. It's a shame they can't see it from mine. When my brother tells me if I really want to stay in NYC I can just get a condo or coop his doesn't understand anything. Besides all the work I put into the house, being in an apartment is very limiting for a person like me. If you're a couch potato who just watches TV all day I suppose it's fine but that's not me. I won't have any kind of life like that.Your plan of just living in the house and not selling it can/might work, but it will be stressful and destroy any relationship you have with your siblings. Plus if things get legally nasty all the inheritance money will go to lawyers on all sides. If your siblings have been, and continue to be, shitty to you then you don't need give them shit from what is left of the inheritance. If your siblings don't turn into shitheads after your mothers death you can give them a $250 or $500 (or whatever) check each month to help them out. Don't give them a lump sum so they have to remain civil with you or you cut them off.
I don't have too many people in my life as it is, so I'm reluctant to end the little human contact I do have. I have a friend who no longer talks to his brother on account of something similar. His brother wanted some money, even though he didn't care for his father, but the father left everything to my friend who did care for him in his last years. And he no longer talks to his daughter for other reasons. It's a sad situation and I don't want to end up that way. I'd like to remain on speaking terms with my siblings, but of course having a roof over my head takes priority.It seems to me the relationship you have with your siblings isn't that great now anyways (at least financially and/or mother's care wise) so who cares if you have to "kiss any relationship with my siblings goodbye" after her death.
Well, that's sort of a last resort if things get bad. These are not nice people I'm talking about. Think of them as a combination of American Gangster and New Jack City. I'm not sure I would want to sic them on my worst enemy, never mind my siblings, but it's an option if things go south.The fact that you mentioned that you know, and are thinking of using "shady people" who could "make things difficult" for your siblings tells me the relationship between you and them isn't that great anyways.
I would like to at least get my mother's non-house assets transferred out of her name in the event she needs long-term custodial care. If my siblings would agree in writing to my terms, I would start splitting her other assets ASAP. Since there's no look-back period on the house for Medicaid purposes, that could even be done a week or two before she might need custodial care. Hopefully she won't, but it's important to think about preserving her assets.Get your mother's house and all other assets transferred into your name so you will have less financial nonsense to deal with after your mothers death. Do it now.
Except it's not going to apply to you. First of all, it's a vote grabbing platitude that will likely never pass Congress. Second, if it were to pass it's most likely only to apply to recent student loans that are owned by the feds (more or less). Third it would have plenty of conditions. It seems really unlikely that the feds are going to pay off collection agencies holding defaulted student loans....This is also why I support any candidate for President who will forgive outstanding student loans...
Except it's not going to apply to you. First of all, it's a vote grabbing platitude that will likely never pass Congress. Second, if it were to pass it's most likely only to apply to recent student loans that are owned by the feds (more or less). Third it would have plenty of conditions. It seems really unlikely that the feds are going to pay off collection agencies holding defaulted student loans.
My loan is held by the feds, not by a collection agency. They tried a few times to sell it to collection agencies but the collection agencies couldn't get a dime off me, so it reverted back to the Feds. I actually got blacklisted by the collection agencies, which means they want to have nothing to do with my student loan, so the feds are out of options trying to get a third party to collect on their behalf. I also sent them tons of documentation about a year ago detailing everything done that was wrong and/or illegal, and it was plenty. For starters the promissory notes stipulated that collection fees could be a maximum of 25% of the original principal. Haven't heard back since from anyone.Except it's not going to apply to you. First of all, it's a vote grabbing platitude that will likely never pass Congress. Second, if it were to pass it's most likely only to apply to recent student loans that are owned by the feds (more or less). Third it would have plenty of conditions. It seems really unlikely that the feds are going to pay off collection agencies holding defaulted student loans.
Agreed. Loans should be replaced with grants, but we should only give grants to people who will get some real benefit from college, not who will go and get some useless degree where they will never make enough to pay off their loans. To me loaning money under onerous terms to 18 year olds, most of whom never managed more money than their allowance, is exploitation. I certainly didn't know what I was getting into at the time, or I never would have signed the papers. I remember a lot of high school teachers said stuff like even if you can't pay off your student loans, they'll usually stop bothering you after a few years. That may have been true for them, but it wasn't after the early 1980s.First we have to stop giving away free, government insured loans to 18 yo kids who want to go to Harvard to get a "crap" degree. I wish I could loan some dipshit $300k, be guaranteed I'd never lose my principle, charge crazy fees, and never allow loans to be wiped clean via bankruptcy.
Under the plans being floated, it wouldn't be considered income. Also, recently Trump changed things so loans forgiven for death or disability are no longer considered income:Plus forgiven student loans are considered income by the IRS, AFAIK. So you'd owe takes on the forgiven amount.
A lot of the outstanding debt is collection fees, and most of those fees are illegal but there's no real enforcement. That's why any of the student loan forgiveness programs would cost far less than people think. It costs the government nothing to basically tell all these collection agencies sorry, but you're not getting your fees, especially since the bulk of those fees were illegally added in the first place. The majority of promissory notes stipulate collection fees can't exceed 20% or 25% of the original principal.For a start I'd be happy if some laws were passed that put a cap on the amount of fees, penalties and jacked up interest rates that apply when loans go into default. A $15,000 loan should never blow up to 100k or 150k or 300k due to defaults. I wonder what percentage of the trillion dollar student loan debt is crazy tacked on fees.
There's something they should do before that. Presuming getting them out of the student loan business isn't an option, the first thing should be to limit the amount a student can borrow to some ratio of the average starting salary for recent college graduates with a job in the field of the major of the student. A credit hour for underwater basket weaving is worth much less to the student than a credit hour in a legit engineering program. If there was a finite money supply for degrees, especially worthless ones, they'd either have drop the cost of those degrees or eliminate them.For a start I'd be happy if some laws were passed that put a cap on the amount of fees, penalties and jacked up interest rates that apply when loans go into default. A $15,000 loan should never blow up to 100k or 150k or 300k due to defaults. I wonder what percentage of the trillion dollar student loan debt is crazy tacked on fees.
Agree with everything you wrote. I'll also add that far too many jobs now require college degrees, even though strictly speaking the job can be done with a high school education. This is likely an end result of far too many people going to college who really shouldn't or don't need it. Traditionally, only fields like medicine or engineering or science required college or post-graduate degrees. Now a lot of stupid office jobs do.There's something they should do before that. Presuming getting them out of the student loan business isn't an option, the first thing should be to limit the amount a student can borrow to some ratio of the average starting salary for recent college graduates with a job in the field of the major of the student. A credit hour for underwater basket weaving is worth much less to the student than a credit hour in a legit engineering program. If there was a finite money supply for degrees, especially worthless ones, they'd either have drop the cost of those degrees or eliminate them.
College/University costs are out of control drastically outpacing inflation because there's virtually no limit to the amount of money students can borrow to then turn around and pay the school with. Colleges & Universities are straight up businesses, not institutions of learning performing a public good. They're in ammenities races with one another to see who can have the most resort like accommodations for students further driving up costs. Being a business, they'll happily sell someone a worthless degree and set the students up for financial ruin. They don't care. They got their slice of the money. They're basically running an expensive 9 month a year "summer" camp for young adults in way too many cases. Since students and parents are apparently terrible at determining the value of the education they're buying (with someone else's money that they borrowed) the cycle currently has no endpoint.
If you had to pay for school out of pocket or with loans that were fairly hard to get and further the loans were from a lender that was quite concerned about your ability to pay back the loan the system would self correct fairly quickly because almost no one could afford the current tuition prices. People used to be able to go to a public university (not community college) and pay for it almost entirely out of pocket with a part time entry level type job. That's a pipe dream now.
Additionally, we need to remove the stigma of not going to college. Not everyone is college material nor does everyone need a college degree. There's no shame in learning a trade. Many of them pay quite well even. It's a total lie that you'll never amount to anything if you don't go to college, but that's what is drummed into most kid's heads from when they were little. That's how you get kids in college already running up loan debt when they don't even know what they want to do.
That's because it's probably the easiest and laziest legal way for an employer to narrow down the pool of prospective candidates. If college ever becomes free everyone will go and it won't be too long after that before you'll need an advanced degree for most jobs.Agree with everything you wrote. I'll also add that far too many jobs now require college degrees, even though strictly speaking the job can be done with a high school education. This is likely an end result of far too many people going to college who really shouldn't or don't need it. Traditionally, only fields like medicine or engineering or science required college or post-graduate degrees. Now a lot of stupid office jobs do.
Operation went extremely well, but won't know full results for a week.How did things go with your wife's operation? How's she been doing?