Tesla doomed

DrunkenBastard

Storage is cool
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
775
Location
on the floor
Tesla purchased SolarCity for $2.6 billion at the end of 2016. Solarcity was the largest manufacturer and installer of solar panels in the US. Musk was the largest shareholder of Solarcity prior to the deal. Apparently they are focusing on "solar tiles" that look like regular shingles from the ground.

Tesla is trying to increase production of its mass market Model 3 series, which sell for much less that the previous Model X and Model S. They also announced their tractor trailer solution recently to available in a year or two.

Their eventual plan is Solarcity solar roof charging a Powerwall home battery unit and your Tesla car.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,451
Location
USA
Tesla purchased SolarCity for $2.6 billion at the end of 2016. Solarcity was the largest manufacturer and installer of solar panels in the US. Musk was the largest shareholder of Solarcity prior to the deal. Apparently they are focusing on "solar tiles" that look like regular shingles from the ground.

Tesla is trying to increase production of its mass market Model 3 series, which sell for much less that the previous Model X and Model S. They also announced their tractor trailer solution recently to available in a year or two.

Their eventual plan is Solarcity solar roof charging a Powerwall home battery unit and your Tesla car.

That Model 3 looks a bit small, like a mid-sized rather than full-sized car. I'd rather be able to buy an full-sized electric Buick (or some normal car ~195-200 inches long) and plug it in since I expect a couple of relocations. Is there some technology that prevents other brands from charging?
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
That Model 3 looks a bit small, like a mid-sized rather than full-sized car. I'd rather be able to buy an full-sized electric Buick (or some normal car ~195-200 inches long) and plug it in since I expect a couple of relocations.
I believe that they call that the Model S....
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,451
Location
USA
What is the point of that? There is so much space junk that they don't need any more.
 

Stereodude

Not really a
Joined
Jan 22, 2002
Messages
10,865
Location
Michigan
What is the point of that? There is so much space junk that they don't need any more.
They needed payload for the Falcon Heavy test, so they used a Telsa Roadster for the lulz.

As for space junk... It's not in low Earth orbit. It's being put in an Eliptical orbit of the Sun where it supposedly will orbit for about a billion years. So, no real issue with space junk.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,451
Location
USA
They needed payload for the Falcon Heavy test, so they used a Telsa Roadster for the lulz.

As for space junk... It's not in low Earth orbit. It's being put in an Eliptical orbit of the Sun where it supposedly will orbit for about a billion years. So, no real issue with space junk.

What about the fluids and leakage/outgassing, etc.?
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,451
Location
USA
Who cares about that? I mean the potential problems with volatiles messing something up. Maybe the driver can't see out the windows. :lol:
 

DrunkenBastard

Storage is cool
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
775
Location
on the floor
Lunar, its a plug in battery vehicle so presumably no volatiles.not sure how they dealt with the battery pack and associated liquid cooling.
 

Striker

Learning Storage Performance
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
269
It doesn't really matter, it isn't sticking around here. It is already out in uncrowded space.
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
They got more performance out of the second stage than expected.

That's a good thing.
 

Stereodude

Not really a
Joined
Jan 22, 2002
Messages
10,865
Location
Michigan
They got more performance out of the second stage than expected.

That's a good thing.
Only if they were doing a "lets run this flat out and see what happens" test. If they had a planned precision burn and got more than expected, it's not.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,451
Location
USA
Only if they were doing a "lets run this flat out and see what happens" test. If they had a planned precision burn and got more than expected, it's not.

Obviously it was not so well controlled. I'm not so sure that 27 small engines will be reliable in the long run.
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
Only if they were doing a "lets run this flat out and see what happens" test. If they had a planned precision burn and got more than expected, it's not.
I guess it is, then.

The third burn was planned to run the fuel out. They had a lot to spare.
 
Top