Prof.Wizard
Wannabe Storage Freak
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2002
- Messages
- 1,460
I've noticed the two programs get almost 50-50 of CPU's power. They both advance at almost half the pace of normal (dedicated) use, but they still return results in a reasonable amount of time.
On the other hand, the above programs in combination with G@h seem to halt.
G@h is rather CPU-consuming and just doesn't leave space for other distributed computing applications to run... (F@h set to its default, recommended, lowest priority though)
And yes, all are "lowest" in my process priorities list.
On the other hand, the above programs in combination with G@h seem to halt.
G@h is rather CPU-consuming and just doesn't leave space for other distributed computing applications to run... (F@h set to its default, recommended, lowest priority though)
And yes, all are "lowest" in my process priorities list.