How about that breakdown of the 'energy bill' listed in the article?
- Harm the environment in Alaska in favor of oil company profits. This does not benefit the US population. It harms wildlife, nature, and otherwise serves to add to corporate profits.
- Give tax breaks to oil, gas, etc. companies. Again no benefit to the US population; just to big business.
- Protect MTBE manufacturers from lawsuits. Hugely anti-consumer.
- Require some use of corn-based ethanol over the next 8 years. I might call this OK but I don't know what the current requirement is. If it's like the "Clean Air Act" it could be worse than what was already mandated.
- Provide a tax credit for people who make their homes slightly more efficient to heat/cool. Still a huge benefit for US energy companies. Really, if the gov't wanted us to make our homes more efficient, a tax credit would be provided for installing energy efficient appliances & HVAC systems. Replacing a 1970s furnace with a modern unit would reduce energy consumption far more than replacing a few windows.
This is yet another piece of evidence that the current US administration does not act on the behalf of the US population.
Oh yeah, the article also said the resulting decrease in consumption could be 100K barrels a day ''And that's using consumption figures from the 1970s. The actual savings should be even higher.''
Uh, numbers from the 70s have no bearing on energy consumption today. Numbers from the 70s don't include the hundreds of millions of PCs in homes and businesses. They don't factor in increased efficiencies in motors, HVAC systems, appliances, & lighting systems. Look at the energy a new refridgerator draws vs. one from that era. My fridge draws less power than the average light bulb.
The numbers wouldn't factor in anything with an Energy Star label, which is darn near everything that draws a substantial amount of electricity nowadays. They wouldn't include cel phone/PDA/MP3 player/battery chargers, microwave ovens (and their displacement of regular stove/oven use), VCRsDVDs, big-screen TVs, anything related to video games, cars that get more than 12 MPG, etc.
OK, enough venting. How exactly does changing your clock reduce energy consumption? The article doesn't say.