Micro-review: Linksys BEFSX41 VPN Router

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,261
Location
I am omnipresent
Anyone remember Mega-Maid from Mel Brooks' "Spaceballs"?

Mega-Maid does not have enough suck to describe the Linksys BEFSX41.

OK, granted, it's a little Linksys black-box Internet Access device. I'll bet 80% of the folks who visit here either have something similar or have at least configured one.

Switching? Fine. It switches. NAT-ing? It's good at that too.
But then there's the VPN thing...

The BEFSX41 is actually the VPN equivalent of anti-matter.

Allow me to explain:
The "VPN" in the product name actually refers to the fact that if you've got two BEFSX41, one on each end of a connection, you can have the routers build an IPSEC-encrypted tunnel with all the 3DES calculations offloaded to the routers.

That certainly is spiffy, isn't it? 'Cause, y'know, that's exactly what I was expecting. Not.

What I was expecting was a device with some kind of built-in client and/or server. Except that the BEFSX41 can't connect to a "standard" P2TP or L2TP RAS server with Windows 200x nor a Linux-based SSH server. Nor can a Linux or Windows client connect to the BEFSX41, at least not using IPSEC with shared key encryption.

So.. I moved on to port redirection to an internal VPN RAS server. Redirected ports 1723 and 500 (required for PPTP) to an internal machine and let fly with a connection on an external client.

Nothing.

After futzing around with the logs, and turning off all firewalling-like options, I discovered that the BEFSX41 has no facility for forwarding IP Protocol #47, Generic Route Encapsulation (this is a protocol, not a port. ICMP, the protocol used by the "ping" command, is protocol #6) to an internal address. No PPTP-based VPN will ever connect unless it can receive that information.

L2TP also failed to connect. I couldn't find a cause, but port 1701 was redirected.

But... some helpful folks who have posted rants similar to this one noted (the reason I am posting this is as a warning and so google snags it, folks) that if you download the 1.41.3 firmware from Linksys' FTP site (this was a downgrade, and that firmware is not availabe on Linksys' web site), the BEFSX41 properly forwards GRE info along with everything else.

And... that worked. I connected. Authenticated. Windows flashed "you are connected" and I could see the connection in RRAS Manager on my server. 30 seconds after connection, though, the VPN would disconnect and no further connections were possible until the router was hard-reset.

I literally spent all day trying to make a VPN work with one of these things. I couldn't do it. In the end I slapped a WRT54G in between the same cables and I was at least able to use my 2000 server as a VPN host.
The BEFSX41 is not worth money. Period. Linksys should be paying people to take it. Stay away.
 

Fushigi

Storage Is My Life
Joined
Jan 23, 2002
Messages
2,890
Location
Illinois, USA
And would you expect better from a division of Cisco?

<Cisco rant>
My employer ordered a Cisco 24 port 10/100 switch. Very vanilla rackmount managed switch. It arrived DOA. Call Cisco to get it replaced. Take a guess how long for a replacement:

1. Same day via tech visit.
2. Next day via FedEx.
3. 3 days via UPS ground.
4. 2+ weeks via method yet to be determined.

I'll give you a hint: The answer is the square of another answer and is not the square root of itself.

WTF is with this company? What happens if it fails in the field? Are sites supposed to just go down and wait weeks for a replacement?

To put this in perspective, we're a large Cisco customer. We buy direct from them. Our rep has only 2 other clients.

Disgusting. They don't value their customers at all. Maybe that's why Cisco & Linksys are such a good fit.
</Cisco rant>
 

e_dawg

Storage Freak
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Messages
1,903
Location
Toronto-ish, Canada
e-mail John Chambers directly. He'd fix it ASAP once you remind him that google and various tech and business media outlets would be interested in how poor their reliability and customer service is as they try to convince everyone that their VoIP solutions will approach the PSTN and carrier-class equipment from Lucent and Nortel in reliability at a much lower TCO.
 
Top