An IT manage at one of the area's casinos came to my office to take some Cisco exams late last year.
We were talking about SANs, since I had a book on my desk on the subject, and he told me about *his* experience trying to use Raptors instead of SCSI drives in a cost-saving effort for his SAN.
I don't remember the exact number of drives he had in his arrays - 24 or 36 I think, but I do remember the RMA rate he told me: he averaged replacing one drive every four weeks.
This is more of that anecdotal evidence that there's something rotten in Lake Forest.
As far as Hitachi goes... I haven't had problems with them. I've pulled out a few bad 60GXPs, but that's ancient history. 180GXPs and 7k250s seem to be great drives. Remember that the 75GXP story actually got mainstream (CNN, WSJ) press. Having a black eye like that, I suspect they're pretty careful with current drive designs. We all know that some geeks will never forgive 'em.