Gilbo
Storage is cool
I was wondering if anyone knew whether the Hitachi 7K3000 drives are emulating 512 byte sectors (and are native 4K), or are actually 512 byte sectors. I've seen conflicting reports in my research.
The website says 512 bytes, but that could easily be through emulation. On the other hand, over at HardOCP at least one poster claims they're native. Apparently, they're able to be native because the better ECC isn't needed since the 7K3000 is lower density, 5-platter 3TB design.
Alternately, does anyone know if they can be jumpered to disable the emulation, and/or if it's doing the single sector, 1st partition offset trick that some WD drives do (which means if try to align the partitions you actually unalign them). (P.S. Does anyone else feel this transition is turning into a clusterfuck?)
As far as what else is still available, I know that Hitachi 7K1000.C's are native 512 byte sector sizes.
I care because sometimes you can't align the partition (eg. for use with ZFS), and, consequently, you end up in trouble no matter how careful you are with the emulated drives.
The website says 512 bytes, but that could easily be through emulation. On the other hand, over at HardOCP at least one poster claims they're native. Apparently, they're able to be native because the better ECC isn't needed since the 7K3000 is lower density, 5-platter 3TB design.
Alternately, does anyone know if they can be jumpered to disable the emulation, and/or if it's doing the single sector, 1st partition offset trick that some WD drives do (which means if try to align the partitions you actually unalign them). (P.S. Does anyone else feel this transition is turning into a clusterfuck?)
As far as what else is still available, I know that Hitachi 7K1000.C's are native 512 byte sector sizes.
I care because sometimes you can't align the partition (eg. for use with ZFS), and, consequently, you end up in trouble no matter how careful you are with the emulated drives.