apairofpcs
Learning Storage Performance
Whoa, you've really had baaaad luck with SSDs! Regarding the concept of "the back-up", some of us must have experienced a drive failure before a back-up was completed. In this case, the data was lost. Therefore, if any hard drive fails at any time, we hope it will be after we do a back up. Since I've had great success with all of my drives since my first desktop pc in July 1992, except for a noisy Samsung Spinwrite drive failing to boot to desktop and having too many bad blocks to function reliably, I insist that any drive I use in either my laptop or desktop has a great track record. Despite jtr1962's testimony, I'm still not convinced that SSDs are more reliable than a generic mechanical drive.dd has had better luck, reliability-wise, than I have. He's also experienced a lower percentage of failures than I have. I've had four Intel drives fail and four OCZ, out of perhaps 120 drives purchased in the last four years. OCZ's support experience is so bad that I decided not to even pursue RMA replacement of the most recent failure. Intel's RMA depot is located close enough that I get RMAs back two business days after I ship them, which really means it's my first choice for anything I need to rely on.
Even if Intel's service center is across the street, it doesn't help that the drive may have failed at the most inopportune moment. If I had a slew of failures with my Maxtor and Western Digital drives, and the noisy Samsung drive I'm currently using with the desktop's Win 7 Ultimate OS failed as well, I would be "less suspicious" of SSDs. Mechanical drives have been exceptionally good to me, especially when one considers that I'm on my 2 pcs probably 12 hours a day.....every day!
Hey Merc, I know you issued a fatwah on Western Digital drives, but these drives have been the most reliable for me and the quietest running. Is there any way that I can soften you up and have you retract that fatwah?