NCQ on Desktop article at Tech Report : differs from SR

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,728
Location
Québec, Québec
The article in question.

Unlike Eugene's latest benchmarks, enabling NCQ on TR's testbed leaded to noticeable performance gains. TR's didn't use light office applications though, but tasks that put a significant workload on the storage system.

And according to their test, Maxtor's DiamondMax 10 seriously kicks the ass of Seagate's 7200.8, which let me believe that they have something deeply flawed in their methodology. Not that I believe that the Seagate should be faster, but the discrepancy between the two drives shouldn't be that huge.
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
Did they defragment the drives? That makes a difference in command-queueing performance....
 
Top