CougTek
Hairy Aussie
At Explosive Labs. There's so many flaws to that review that it's not even worth mentioning them. They used PC Mark, which should tell you enough.
The main reason I link it is to provide a hint of the performances (or lack of) of the upcoming 160GB SpinPoint. Look at the transfer rates, comparable but no better than the Seagate Barracuda ATA V. It scores rather poorly (for a newcomer) in most of the other butchered benchmarks too. So, although this review isn't enough to get a definitive opinion on the latest Samsung drive, I think the trend is pretty clear that it won't be a speed demon. Just "another drive". The positive point is that it carries the famous 3 years warranty.
Bottom line : ok for budget boxes, but look elsewhere for your mainstream systems.
The main reason I link it is to provide a hint of the performances (or lack of) of the upcoming 160GB SpinPoint. Look at the transfer rates, comparable but no better than the Seagate Barracuda ATA V. It scores rather poorly (for a newcomer) in most of the other butchered benchmarks too. So, although this review isn't enough to get a definitive opinion on the latest Samsung drive, I think the trend is pretty clear that it won't be a speed demon. Just "another drive". The positive point is that it carries the famous 3 years warranty.
Bottom line : ok for budget boxes, but look elsewhere for your mainstream systems.