Something Random

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
Who cares? Buy both.

It's $60 at Target.

So for those still on the fence, it comes in a little open ended box wide enough to fit two standard blu-ray cases inside. One contains three DVDs with the digital copies. The other contains 6 blu-rays, one movie and one special effects for each movie.

I'm imagining they go a little fancier with a super collectors edition with the extended versions once the milking process has stopped bearing fruit with the theatricals.
 

timwhit

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 23, 2002
Messages
5,278
Location
Chicago, IL
I wish they would just release the extended editions. I have only seen the extended edition of Two Towers.

I just watched all three movies for the first time 2 weeks ago. I'd like to see the extended editions of Fellowship and Return of the King. But, I'll wait for HD versions, DVD looks like crap to me now.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,232
Location
I am omnipresent
There's nothing wrong with the theatrical versions of the movies. I've seen both several times and in general the things that are in the extended editions are, you know, things that didn't NEED to be in the films.

I'm not sure I understand what the "digital copy" is for. It says "for PC and Mac" on it, so I suppose it's some DRM-laden payload or other. I'm kind of annoyed I had to pay for that.

The special features discs are DVDs, not BDs. They might even be the same special features that shipped with the original DVD release. That wouldn't surprise me.

Anyway, I'm going to wait and watch the trilogy with my friend at some point next weekend. I don't think I can dedicate TWO twelve hour blocks of time to it in a two week period.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
God damn it. Pieces of crap aren,t playing in the ps3. Plus its encoded with vc1.

I need a drink
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
=onestly if u have the dvd extended set don't even bother with this tripe. The sound is the only redeeming quality about it.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,232
Location
I am omnipresent
Sadly, if the transfer is bad it's unlikely they'll correct the issue until they get around to doing a "digitally remastered 20th anniversary edition."

Also, this is why I don't normally buy BDs until I've actually watched them.

But I am Peter Jackson's bitch, and will buy Lord of the Rings in any format in which it is released.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
Good news is the third movie does in fact play. And it does look better. All I need is replacements formovies 1 and 2.

You would think for something this high profile - prob only star wars could be bigger, they would do th best job they could
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
Well I have to say Amazon customer service came through for me again.

Emailed them with my troubles (DVD/blu-rays not usually being returnable if opened), within 5 minutes got a reply back, very sorry for my experience, they've shipped another copy (overnight) and to ship my defective copy back to them within 30 days.

I can only imagine what kind of hell I would have had if I had bought it at a brick and mortar store.

Flawless victory (fingers crossed it's just a random variation and the replacements work), though a bad batch wouldn't be out of the question.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,232
Location
I am omnipresent
All three of my discs at least start and play through the first 10 minutes.
There is a distinct difference in video quality between Fellowship and Return of the King, but even in FotR there's a superior picture to my DVD copy.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
The first two turn my ps3 into a brick until I cycle power. My wife doesn't like the bits missing (we've seen the extended dvds multiple times. She thought this disc was skipping and buggered too.

If you had only seen the theatricals you wouldn't know what you are missing.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,454
Location
USA
The Samsung 2TB drive from Newegg dropped in price to $149.99 today if anyone was waiting for that to happen.

The prices are down all over the place. For example, WD20EARS is $139 and there are four 2TB drives at $149. Perhaps larger drives are on the horizon.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,719
Location
Horsens, Denmark
I regularly travel in excess of 75mph on the country roads here at night. On at least a dozen occasions, farm equipment has been left unattended across the lanes, without lights or reflective tape. Haven't hit anything yet. People just don't pay attention. You don't need to stop, just slow down and veer.

That we treat everyone as having the same driving capabilities is as dumb as assuming everyone can be competitive in a basketball game.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
  • It was dark.
  • Dipped headlights reach less than 50m.
  • Assuming 65mph, you would need at least 120m to stop (reaction time + deceleration).

Not only that:

- This is dual carriageway with no overhead lights. Almost invariably you are on low beams for the majority of the time due to oncoming traffic lanes to your left, usually separated by a grassy verge.

- Roll-off trailer somehow became delatched, and extended upwards enough to hit bridge crossing over Thruway, then fell down onto road way. Truck cab is hundred metres down the road.

- So the driver of the van comes across the skip, and on either side of the roadway is the bridge supports.

- He did veer, but ended up sideswiping the skip. I think he did well. If he'd hit it head on everyone on that van would likely be dead. Also the handling characteristics of what was probably a 15 seat type passenger van is not the best for sudden slalom type activities.

If that had been me, I would likely have been doing the old "keep the car between the lines" monotony and plowed right into the little bastard. Actually I would tend to take the hit (say with a deer) than try to avoid it and hit an oncoming vehicle. Now if it there were moose around...
 

udaman

Wannabe Storage Freak
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
1,209
I regularly travel in excess of 75mph on the country roads here at night. On at least a dozen occasions, farm equipment has been left unattended across the lanes, without lights or reflective tape. Haven't hit anything yet. People just don't pay attention. You don't need to stop, just slow down and veer.

That we treat everyone as having the same driving capabilities is as dumb as assuming everyone can be competitive in a basketball game.

Just one night, when ur just a little more sleepy, eyes a little less able to focus, just a smidgen less microseconds of attention, that veer may come such that the suspension can't handle the abrupt maneuver ....and then we know why you stopped posting here :D

Don't assume you'll always have the same lightning speed responses...doing so @75mph+ is foolish (dumb in ur words :p ).

10mph slower could make the difference btw life n death, when u get older perhaps it will dawn on u...maybe not...Darwin experiment.

And what of you not having the ability, say the rare occurrence when u also have microseconds to decide what to do, if there are oncoming vehicle(s). Do you end up making a wife/husband/spouse & children at home a widower. Kind of selfish, self-centered actions if u ask me. There are other (potential) lives to consider, not just ur own. If it's a straight road, clear line of sight, I can see little risk. But what of blind spots, curves in the road?

I used to know a winemaker, he had a Pontiac Grand Am with the stealth supercharger. He used to ride motorcycles @ur age, thought he'd never make it past 50 (his son died of a tragic, 1 in a million carburetor backfire/gasoline vapor ignition that burned his lungs so badly he died shortly thereafter). After we were done drinknig wines at his winery, he would leave in that GA, blasting down the super twisty backroads of River Road West, Sonoma Cty. I tried to keep up with him on those *narrow*, barely more enough for 2way traffic, twisty roads (say 25mph is the max even a F1 or go cart could pull)...in my old '85 Civic. Didn't take him much time to pull away from me, once we left the winery. He was very familiar with those roads, but he was taking up the entire road to go as fast as he did, and could have easily had an head on collision flying around all of the tight turns with multiple blind spots. ...the next James Dean?

Deserted backcountry roads, until another car you didn't see comes around the bend & you both end up dead. Call me a Tortoise, but I'll be relative sure to be able to drive that road again, come the next day.

Lot of 'roadkill' motorcyclists around these parts, Mulholland Drive, up in SM Mtn's inland from Malibu, is a fave. Heh, David Lynch made a movie with that road as a plot line prop

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0166924/

Yeah, deserted country roads, until you find that rare occurence, I'm sure you don't mind the 1-100,000 odds. But I prefer for u to do a safer alternative like playing the lottery. If you beat the odds there, you retire w/o endangering someone's life
 

jtr1962

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 25, 2002
Messages
4,365
Location
Flushing, New York
Speaking of high-speed trains and China ( udaman's post a few pages back ):

China Offers To Build High-Speed Rail to California

China Wants 380 km/hr Trains

First off, given the cost overruns and delays typical of any infrastructure project done by American workers, I think California should take China up on their offer. Let the American workers learn from them. When they're done in CA, send them to NYC to build us a couple of more subway lines. Queens in particular could use a few more subways

Second, I did read elsewhere about China wanting to run their HSR lines at 380 km/hr, and it raised my eyebrow. The second article I linked to tells why. Japan, which is arguably the farthest ahead in HSR, has been unable to overcome the technical problems needed to run at 360 km/hr, never mind 380 km/hr. Sure, you can run trains much faster for one-time stunts ( the French hit nearly 575 km/hr in tests ). That's quite a bit different than sustaining those speeds reliably and economically in day-to-day service. So China can build the lines cheap, but just don't expect the running times their touting. More likely than not, we'll see 320 km/hr, perhaps 330, with a proportionate increase in scheduled times. Nevertheless, it's still quite an accomplishment to go from nothing to tens of thousands of kilometers of high-speed lines in less than a decade, even if they don't meet that 380 km/hr goal in the near future. 320 km/hr is still world's better than the 79 mph or less Amtrak does on most of its network.

Now get these guys over here ASAP, and let's lay a few thousand miles of HSR on this side of the Pacific!
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,232
Location
I am omnipresent
That's more or less the level of discourse in the Senate at the moment,

Last year, Senator Al Franken's hearings on Employee conduct among military contractors basically led to a number of Republican Senators (34 of them, if memory serves, but whatever the number was, it was too many) standing against a Blackwater employee's ability to seek justice for having been raped by another Blackwater employee.

Seriously.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,454
Location
USA
Not only that:

- This is dual carriageway with no overhead lights. Almost invariably you are on low beams for the majority of the time due to oncoming traffic lanes to your left, usually separated by a grassy verge.

- Roll-off trailer somehow became delatched, and extended upwards enough to hit bridge crossing over Thruway, then fell down onto road way. Truck cab is hundred metres down the road.

- So the driver of the van comes across the skip, and on either side of the roadway is the bridge supports.

- He did veer, but ended up sideswiping the skip. I think he did well. If he'd hit it head on everyone on that van would likely be dead. Also the handling characteristics of what was probably a 15 seat type passenger van is not the best for sudden slalom type activities.

If that had been me, I would likely have been doing the old "keep the car between the lines" monotony and plowed right into the little bastard. Actually I would tend to take the hit (say with a deer) than try to avoid it and hit an oncoming vehicle. Now if it there were moose around...

If the van came across the rear of the truck several minutes later, it would have been completely stopped when the van collided with it. The van was going too fast for the conditions. In the 60s they taught that one should drive in a manner so as to be able to stop in time for a stationary vehicle or object.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
If the van came across the rear of the truck several minutes later, it would have been completely stopped when the van collided with it. The van was going too fast for the conditions. In the 60s they taught that one should drive in a manner so as to be able to stop in time for a stationary vehicle or object.

In normal dry conditions a 2 second gap is prudent. However that is when following a vehicle that is properly illuminated at night. In this case, the dump box of the truck was sitting across the roadway. No lights, likely no reflective panels to even indicate something was there until it was right in the headlights. I get this sometimes where people wearing all black clothing are walking along the road at night. For the love of god put on a reflective vest so I can see and avoid you!

An update on the story, good news, no deaths or critical injuries:

"The dump truck that struck an overpass on the New York State Thruway on Wednesday morning was not equipped with a warning light that would have told the driver that the bed of the truck was raised.

The accident occurred about 4:30 a.m. when John Hoey of Oswego was driving his truck eastbound near mile marker 337. Unbeknownst to Hoey, the bed of the truck was raised and struck the County Route 7 overpass in Manchester, Ontario County.

State law requires a truck like Hoey’s to have a “tilt bed warning light” visible to the driver which would alert the driver to a raised bed, but Hoey’s truck was not equipped with one. Hoey was issued for not having proper equipment.

Seventeen people were injured when the two vehicles they were riding in struck the bed of the truck which detached from the truck when it struck the overpass and landed in the driving lanes. Though serious, none of the injuries was considered life-threatening."

http://www.democratandchronicle.com...driver-cited-in-Thruway-crash-that-injured-17
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
Of course the number of people who drive at 65 MPH on the Thruway are very limited. I do it myself after years of indoctrination by Australian speed cameras hidden behind every bush. 80 would prob be a more likely speed at that time of night.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
Dave, for your multiple monitor customer:

http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/08/runcos-windowwall-gives-you-the-100-000-view-you-always-wanted/

4-7-10-runcowindowwall250.jpg


Of course you're paying Runco premium pricing there.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,719
Location
Horsens, Denmark
There are certainly some pricey options out there. One of the reasons most pre-fab systems aren't ideal is that they are designed flat (to accommodate multiple viewers), while mine will be designed for one and will be wrapped around them to a certain degree. Anyone know how multiple monitors/eyefinity will interact with the upcoming 3D technologies?
 

Handruin

Administrator
Joined
Jan 13, 2002
Messages
13,916
Location
USA
When I was at PAX, nvidia was demoing their 3D which required a minimum level graphics (which escapes me), their goggles, and 120Hz monitors or projectors. One of their demos was using 3 projectors with the game Dirt and one with battlefield bad company 2. I doubt their technology will work with eyefinity, but if this is one of the new trends, AMD will likely follow at some point.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
There are certainly some pricey options out there. One of the reasons most pre-fab systems aren't ideal is that they are designed flat (to accommodate multiple viewers), while mine will be designed for one and will be wrapped around them to a certain degree. Anyone know how multiple monitors/eyefinity will interact with the upcoming 3D technologies?

As long as the monitors can be driven at a true 120Hz, should be OK. The question is, to get 60Hz 3D effects in full say 1080p, you need to be delivering 120 frames at that rez. Of course with Eyefinity 6 that rez is much higher. Even a 5970 can't do that kind of performance on a single card. 3 wide might be OK, would be dependent on the demands of the particular game.
 
Top