Howell said:
bahngeist said:
The Galen Institute is a Tax Reform advocacy group and ultraconservative to the point that they make the current administration almost ‘pinko’ in comparison.
I'm not sure if that's accurate and if it is I'm not sure what difference it makes. This sounds like an argument "to the man" not the issue. I get these terms confused, Is that Ad Hominem?
Yea, I am guilty of an ad hominem attack – engaging in the hyperbole in this instance just couldn’t be resisted :mrgrn: The point I was trying to make is that when presenting an argument/position, it generally isn’t wise to depend principally on source(s) whose position is skewed significantly, lacks authority, or is otherwise questionable (a major problem with the Internet). As an academic librarian, the Galen Institute’s articles -- which were quite hyperbolic in ‘my’ estimation -- just sent up too many corresponding red flags ...
Re. the dialogue between the difference in health care costs, etc., between the U.S. and Canada: the following link provides an authoritative perspective that is quite illuminating:
http://www.oecd.org/document/38/0,2340,en_2649_201185_16560422_1_1_1_1,00.html
Of note is that Canada, despite its having a national health care program, commits a lesser % of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health care than the U.S. does. More noteworthy, however, is that the health costs challenges both countries are addressing are generally pervasive across the globe. And in general the U.S. is doing comparatively well in respect of honouring its associated responsibilities to its citizens.