I don't get why. I scored 1320/1600 on the SAT (570 verbal, 750 math), made Princeton and Yale (chose the former), and was wait-listed at MIT (ultimately didn't get in). No GPA at my high school. We used numerical marks with 100% being the highest. IIRC my average was about 96.1. Regarding the subject at hand, a good black female friend of mine in HS with scores very similar to mine did in fact make MIT. Yes, I was royally pissed even if I was happy for her. I know exactly what Greg is going through.
Oh, and it looks like I'm the village idiot now given my SAT score. But then again I only took it once. I know people who took it a few times, boosting their scores each time.
Lol, jtr's score is *way* higher than my mediocre scores. But hey, I came from grade inflation era, and back then you only needed a 3.5 GPA, and I was @3.75. So in my application to UCLA, I refused to write the 'personal' paragraph (had to take remedial English, ie English 4 dummies
in freshman year) saying that my GPA assured me of getting in...smartarse I was. Think my combined was something like <1100, can't recall. Higher in math but not that high. I remember some of the 'brains' in my high school senior class, some of them aced it, got perfect 1600, others pretty close. David what's his name, straight A's near 1600 on the SAT, I recall he was smokin weed in his senior year...while I never took any drugs in high school.
As smart as some of my classmates were, they never really impressed me with anything other than they were really good at studies. They didn't seem to be smart in any other ways, no street smarts, crappy taste in music or fashion, you know, the important stuff
. Couldn't fix a engine problem, or get their hands all greasy.
While I was always the tinkerer, always inquisitive, how things work, engines, computers, biology, cameras etc. And somehow, those smart people, well they didn't seem smarter than me. Few years into college, while visiting with a friend, I met one of his friends who had a new g/f. Not the prettiest, not the smartest or in anyway appealing as far as I could see, but huge knockers, like Pam Anderson. And yet this guy of 19 was starting med school, after graduating with straight A's from UCLA in just 3yrs, as he was of 'genius' IQ.
Brings me to the dSLR thread, and person I mentioned with the D3 and Gitzo tripod. Just did a Google search on him (yeah, I'm a stalker with low IQ and SAT scores
)...:rotfl: I did not realize he was *that* much of a character:
Here's a pix of his now recently retired D2x? I don't see how he could get by with that thin leather strap, I wouldn't use that even on my lightweight OM-1:
http://www.willamette.edu/cla/classics/VIPs/karp.html
At the age of 20, while majoring in Medieval Studies at Wesleyan University, he published a translation of the 6th-century Latin author Venantius Fortunatus.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2002/08/19/020819fa_fact_seabrook
passage from brilliant Upper East Side private-school kid to heroin addict was a sad but familiar story. ...father, was an extraordinarily successful businessman. ... published a translation of the sixth-century writer Venantius Fortunatus when he was twenty. Not only did he get 800s on the S.A.T.s, but he got 800s on a friend's S.A.T.s too, and did it while coming down from LSD. ... worked on Wall Street in risk arbitrage and option trading and was fired in 1984 after drugs were found in his desk. ... went on to indulge in a life total hedonism until the money ran out and his parents put him in detox. ... has been completely sober for almost twelve years
Hey, he's my new ^
essential hero(inside joke jtr might get, in reference to 'her'...be careful who you idolize
). What a tale, no Efin way that part could be true! .
Actually he's a pretty nice guy, just a polar opposite to my personality- he's very, very hyper without any foreign substances in his system. Energizer bunny for sure. Mind never seems to slow down, hard to keep up with him.
And yet, with 5yrs on a D2x, and months on a D3, $20k in lenses; he had trouble getting the AF to work while trying to hand-hold a shot @FM of a cluster of grapes. Deciding not to use the images because they were not in correct focus. Me wondering if he's taken the time to understand how AF's work, or the AF segmenting in the D3