timwhit said:They are still about $6 per disc. When a single layer disc is 50 cents, it is hard to justify 12 times the cost.
No, they're essentially equivalent. If anything, casual observation (of CDfreak's NEC forum) leads me to believe that people might perfer the older 3500, but by the slimmest of margins (i.e would fall within statistical error...if anyone was doing such a study)....but I'm also a bit biased (3500 owner) and don't pay as close attention to the 3520.I gather the 3520 is a better burner?
That would depend entirely upon what manufacturer produced the media for the discs that Memorex is selling. However, and in general (based upon what I've read, as opposed to any great amount of first hand experience), the NEC drives seem to tolerate most media fairly well. But one should not ignore ancient computer proverb - "garbage in, garbage out". Also beware that Memorex , and many other brand labels, have a habbit of switching media suppliers - sometimes good, sometimes not so good.How does it work with DVD-r Memorex disks?
Spec wise, I think the only difference is that the newer 3520 can do 8x RW (versus 4x on 3500) and can also handle -R DL (whereas the 3500 can only handle +R DL) .... I could be wrong though.Santilli said:I gather the 3520 is a better burner?
Santilli said:Pricing is weird. the 3500 is more expensive then the 3520?
s
Santilli said:Pricing is weird. the 3500 is more expensive then the 3520?
I skirted this issue in my above post. But now that you brought it up...Mercutio said:Not always...
For write once dics, I stick with those employing Taiyo Yuden media, which is arguably the best optical media manufacturer....Most of my burning, however, is on DVD+RWs, which the 3500 handles like a charm.