That video just goes against the narrative that he was just an innocent peaceful ICU nurse helping people.
You don't see any
possible justification for being physically demonstrative over the actions of Immigration Enforcement? None at all? If he was acting in an unacceptable fashion in the moment, why was he not detained in that moment?
If the agents are found to have acted illegally they should face the full weight of the justice system. We know now that his pistol was taken from him seconds before the shooting, hopefully bodycams will show what happened in the melee after that.
That's complete and utter bullshit and you know it. Cops turn off bodycams all the time with zero repercussions. Recordings "get lost" and this administration in particular has gone out of its way to protect ICE Agents.
Hate-Gargoyle Stephen Miller has even publicly claimed that everything they do is legally protected. The administration won't even tell the state of Minnesota which officers fired on Mr. Pretti.
Now let's take a step back for a second:
Alex Pretti was carrying a firearm lawfully, in line with his second amendment right. The firearm was removed from his person during an altercation with ICE, who are neither police nor military agents but apparently have some other ill-defined power over US Citizens. He was visibly not brandishing the firearm and he was shot in the head and then
nine more times after he was relieved of the weapon. You have indicated that he was a violent person who deserved to be summarily murdered for merely having a lawfully-carried gun at a protest, as is his right guaranteed by the US Constitution. You might argue that in the chaos of the moment, the ICE agents thought there was a threat to their safety, but by the point they were shooting, he was already defenseless. This is if nothing else a lack of training, discipline and and observation among a purported law enforcement entity. It suggests to me that these officers should not, broadly speaking, be armed in the normal conduct of their duties.
Right Wing demonstrators who arrive at protests with firearms never seem to be met with violence. They're often given rather favorable treatment by law enforcement, something that I have observed in person during BLM protests in 2020. Kyle Rittenhouse is a poster child for this, as were the many violent protestors at the Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville in 2018 and the many January 6th Insurrectionists.
So my question is, is the Second Amendment only applicable when Racists and Fascists do it? Is the great wrong here that Human- or Civil Rights are not sufficiently important to protest in the first place? Gun rights advocates as a whole don't seem terribly interested in protecting their fellow citizens from clear evidence of a tyrannical government. Why is that?