Forums sluggish
- Thread starter P5-133XL
- Start date
What time have you noticed a performance issue? I've been seeing a big problem around 12:30 am to 2:00am -5 GMT. I'm not awake much after 2:00 so I can't tell how the speed is.
I noticed this happeneind the past few days so I've been complaining to the support. I think it has to due with their backup method or something.
I've been noticing load averages such as: load average: 17.63, 13.60, 9.99 on this linux box at times. I don't know how this is in comparision to normal linux machines.
I noticed this happeneind the past few days so I've been complaining to the support. I think it has to due with their backup method or something.
I've been noticing load averages such as: load average: 17.63, 13.60, 9.99 on this linux box at times. I don't know how this is in comparision to normal linux machines.
Mercutio
Fatwah on Western Digital
Lower loads are better. A load of about 1 is ideal. Someone you're sharing your box with is creating lots of processes and generally not being a very good neighbor.
timwhit
Hairy Aussie
Like right now it is unbearably slow.
blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
yes, it was particularly sluggish this afternoon and then suddenly cleared up.. but alas, it is again slow like the molasses at the bottom of an empty molasses jar... that once contained molasses....
molasses....
molasses....
The high load averages I posted occur late at night and it's because of their backup. They copy one hard drive to another as far as I can tell using rsynch. (I think that's what I saw)
I've been eyeing up an unmanaged dedicated host at rack shack (also here) for $99 per month, but the cost is too high at the moment for me. I don't have enough to offset that monthly bill.
Does this site slow down every day at some point as a few of you mentioned? I didn't get a chance to check this afternoon, so I didn't notice.
I know that support is focused right now on another serious issue with a host that has been hacked twice now. They moved everyone off the host and basically reinstalled Linux. The hacked broke in the first time through a kernel exploit on the same day it was found by the public. He then left some type of root kit to gain access at a later date. So they decided to clean the host to remove the possibility of that happening again.
With that said, they haven’t spent much time helping me with the nightly load issue on this site. I’m guessing this server has 40-50 users because everyone on this server is a reseller such as myself. At some point the line has to be drawn were no more clients can have accounts, but where that line is isn’t clear.
I've been eyeing up an unmanaged dedicated host at rack shack (also here) for $99 per month, but the cost is too high at the moment for me. I don't have enough to offset that monthly bill.
Does this site slow down every day at some point as a few of you mentioned? I didn't get a chance to check this afternoon, so I didn't notice.
I know that support is focused right now on another serious issue with a host that has been hacked twice now. They moved everyone off the host and basically reinstalled Linux. The hacked broke in the first time through a kernel exploit on the same day it was found by the public. He then left some type of root kit to gain access at a later date. So they decided to clean the host to remove the possibility of that happening again.
With that said, they haven’t spent much time helping me with the nightly load issue on this site. I’m guessing this server has 40-50 users because everyone on this server is a reseller such as myself. At some point the line has to be drawn were no more clients can have accounts, but where that line is isn’t clear.
Howell
Storage? I am Storage!
I wonder if they have done something dumb like place both of the drives on the same IDE controller.
Mercutio
Fatwah on Western Digital
SF is slow? Really? It's just like it always is on my 19.2 aggregate connection...
No, seriously, I'm getting TONS of "the site you're attempting is not responding" messages from Moz, and it's deeply annoying.
No, seriously, I'm getting TONS of "the site you're attempting is not responding" messages from Moz, and it's deeply annoying.
blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
I got a couple DNS errors inbetween posts in IE.. the site was obvisouly being resolved into an IP, however it didn't appear that the server was responding with anything.
When the site's slow a ICMP ping always returns quite fast (~50ms) It's obviously not network related, simply too much going on in the server I guess.
When the site's slow a ICMP ping always returns quite fast (~50ms) It's obviously not network related, simply too much going on in the server I guess.
blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
should you really post the time in PST? the times are automatically posted next to each post with a standard based on GMT.
I concurr, the forums are now zipping right along.
I concurr, the forums are now zipping right along.
Can I ask you guys for a little more help. When the forum is running really slow, can you run a tracert.
Can you then copy and past that information for me the next time it happens? XXX out your IP, or if privacy is an issue, don't worry about posting this. If you'd rather not post that info, but would like to help, please send it to me by PM. (if no one wants to I completely understand)
I'm going to do the same thing, but I'm not always awake when the site slows down. (last night for example)
The support for the site has asked me for this information. I'll provide them with mine, but I'd also like to include other people's tracert's if available.
Thanks for the info so far.
Can you then copy and past that information for me the next time it happens? XXX out your IP, or if privacy is an issue, don't worry about posting this. If you'd rather not post that info, but would like to help, please send it to me by PM. (if no one wants to I completely understand)
I'm going to do the same thing, but I'm not always awake when the site slows down. (last night for example)
The support for the site has asked me for this information. I'll provide them with mine, but I'd also like to include other people's tracert's if available.
Thanks for the info so far.
Here is my tracert from when it's running fast. I'll be sure to post my results from when it's running slow (probably late tonight).
Code:
Tracing route to storageforum.net [207.99.69.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.3
2 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.104.192.1
3 9 ms 9 ms 14 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.cftnnj.cv.net [67.83.244.34]
4 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms r4-ge9-1.mhe.prnynj.cv.net [67.83.244.5]
5 10 ms 12 ms 9 ms ool-4353ef32.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.239.50]
6 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms r1-srp5-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.12.145]
7 12 ms 10 ms 11 ms r2-srp13-0.cr.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.12.100]
8 29 ms 11 ms 11 ms r2-srp5-0.in.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.12.2]
9 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms gi4-1.msfc1.tlw.nac.net [167.206.16.130]
10 14 ms 12 ms 14 ms gi4-5.msfc1.nyc.nac.net [209.123.11.229]
11 14 ms 15 ms 12 ms 0094.ge-3-0-0.gbr2.nyc.nac.net [64.21.102.13]
12 22 ms 14 ms 14 ms 1194.at-0-0-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.10]
13 19 ms 15 ms 14 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
14 16 ms 16 ms 15 ms fa0-0.core1.pwebtech.com [207.99.8.197]
15 16 ms 15 ms 18 ms 207.99.69.2
Trace complete.
mubs
Storage? I am Storage!
I tried to post in the Computer forum, and got a "Page cannot be found" after I hit the submit button. Same thing happened last night, about 9:30 pm PST.
I'm on ADSL (1500 down / 128 up).
Code:
Tracing route to storageforum.net [207.99.69.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.2.1
2 15 ms 16 ms 16 ms adsl-67-122-167-252.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.122.167.252]
3 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms dist1-vlan60.lsan03.pbi.net [216.102.181.1]
4 16 ms 16 ms 15 ms bb1-g2-1.lsan03.pbi.net [67.116.100.65]
5 15 ms 16 ms 16 ms bb1-p12-0.eqlaca.sbcglobal.net [67.116.100.38]
6 16 ms 31 ms 16 ms lax1-br1-g4-1.gnaps.net [206.223.123.41]
7 16 ms 31 ms 31 ms 199.232.44.6
8 62 ms 78 ms 78 ms chi2-br1-p2-0.gnaps.net [199.232.44.1]
9 94 ms 94 ms 93 ms qcy1-avici1-p1-16-1.gnaps.net [199.232.42.97]
10 94 ms 109 ms 109 ms 199.232.44.25
11 109 ms 94 ms 93 ms 199.232.44.22
12 93 ms 110 ms 109 ms 0504.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ash.nac.net [209.123.24.173]
13 109 ms 125 ms 110 ms 0195.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.138]
14 110 ms 109 ms 125 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
15 171 ms 125 ms 110 ms fa0-0.core1.pwebtech.com [207.99.8.198]
16 109 ms 125 ms 110 ms 207.99.69.2
Trace complete.I'm on ADSL (1500 down / 128 up).
blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
Handruin said:
handruin, goto http://www.visualware.com/visualroute/livedemo.html you can selecct from any of the 16 servers located around the globe and do visual traces to the site originating from the visualroute server you're connected to... it's truely neat.
in any event, as you may know by now it's probably not a network issue(i havent tried really large ping sizes yet though)... it's probably a server load issue...
blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
just have them bump storageforum.net to realtime priority right?
This is what I have so far:
Code:
Tracing route to storageforum.net [207.99.69.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 19 ms 38 ms 11 ms 10.195.0.1
2 36 ms 13 ms 28 ms rtr01-bgp.townisp.com [216.195.0.17]
3 13 ms 10 ms 10 ms 12.125.39.25
4 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms gbr2-p70.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.123.40.102]
5 14 ms 11 ms 14 ms tbr1-p013701.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.122.11.197]
6 24 ms 36 ms 18 ms tbr2-p013701.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.22]
7 20 ms 18 ms 18 ms gar1-p340.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.185]
8 16 ms 19 ms 15 ms att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]
9 22 ms 19 ms 19 ms 1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.69]
10 28 ms 19 ms 20 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
11 82 ms 19 ms 22 ms fa0-0.core1.pwebtech.com [207.99.8.198]
12 27 ms 22 ms 23 ms 207.99.69.2
Trace complete.Howell
Storage? I am Storage!
It got laggy on me there for a second.
Code:
1 <10 ms 15 ms <10 ms smoothwall [192.168.0.1]
2 16 ms <10 ms 16 ms adsl-34-154-1.cha.bellsouth.net [67.34.154.1]
3 <10 ms 15 ms 16 ms 209.215.10.1
4 16 ms <10 ms 16 ms 205.152.151.248
5 31 ms 31 ms 32 ms axr00asm-7-0-0-2.bellsouth.net [65.83.237.28]
6 31 ms 31 ms 32 ms pxr00asm-0-0-0.bellsouth.net [65.83.236.0]
7 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms 0.so-0-0-0.GW13.ATL5.ALTER.NET [157.130.73.97]
8 47 ms 31 ms 31 ms 0.so-0-1-0.XL2.ATL5.ALTER.NET [152.63.84.102]
9 32 ms 47 ms 31 ms POS7-0.BR2.ATL5.ALTER.NET [152.63.82.193]
10 32 ms 32 ms 31 ms 204.255.174.150
11 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms tbr1-p012402.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.12.29]
12 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms tbr2-p013801.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.69]
13 * * * Request timed out.
14 62 ms 47 ms 63 ms tbr1-p012201.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.17]
15 62 ms 47 ms 62 ms gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]
16 47 ms 47 ms 62 ms att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]
17 62 ms 47 ms 63 ms 1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.69]
18 78 ms 78 ms 63 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
19 47 ms 62 ms 63 ms fa0-0.core1.pwebtech.com [207.99.8.198]
20 47 ms 63 ms 62 ms 207.99.69.2
Trace complete.Howell
Storage? I am Storage!
Otherwise I've had no problems on any day.
I've setup a tracert task to run every ten minutes from my machine all night long. Can you guys let me know what time the site slows down if at all.
I have to get some sleep so I won't be able to tell what time it happens. Once I hear what time this happens, I can then give them the tracert from that time.
I have to get some sleep so I won't be able to tell what time it happens. Once I hear what time this happens, I can then give them the tracert from that time.
blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
The site's a little slower than it should be(slower than earlier) since I got on about 5-10 minutes ago... but i haven't gotten any errors.
Code:
Tracing route to storageforum.net [207.99.69.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.100
2 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 10.62.16.1
3 10 ms 7 ms 7 ms pos6-1.kscyksgibb-rtr1.kc.rr.com [24.94.161.137]
4 8 ms 10 ms 9 ms pos1-0.lvwoksleav-rtr1.kc.rr.com [24.94.161.25]
5 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms pos1-0.kscymonort-rtr1.kc.rr.com [24.94.161.21]
6 9 ms 10 ms 11 ms pos6-0.kscymordc-rtr1.kc.rr.com [24.94.161.17]
7 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms srp14-0.kscymordc-rtr3.kc.rr.com [24.94.160.193]
8 10 ms 11 ms 9 ms srp14-0.kscymordc-rtr4.kc.rr.com [24.94.160.194]
9 61 ms 121 ms 10 ms pop1-kcy-P3-0.atdn.net [66.185.137.237]
10 14 ms 11 ms 11 ms bb1-kcy-P0-0.atdn.net [66.185.137.224]
11 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms bb1-chi-P6-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.124]
12 25 ms 23 ms 23 ms bb2-chi-P7-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.131]
13 43 ms 43 ms 43 ms bb2-vie-P10-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.215]
14 46 ms 43 ms 44 ms bb2-ash-P15-2.atdn.net [66.185.152.20]
15 44 ms 44 ms 44 ms pop2-ash-P1-0.atdn.net [66.185.139.211]
16 49 ms 49 ms 50 ms NetAccess.atdn.net [66.185.151.158]
17 52 ms 51 ms 62 ms 0195.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.138]
18 50 ms 52 ms 51 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
19 51 ms 52 ms 52 ms fa0-0.core1.pwebtech.com [207.99.8.198]
20 52 ms 52 ms 52 ms 207.99.69.2
Trace complete.blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
I take that back, it's ass slow now.. pages are taking very long to load.. but it seems to vary( I timed opening the home page... took just under 4 minutes... next link took about 10 seconds.. next too something like 1 minute)... still not getting errors in IE though.
Definately not a network issue.
Code:
Pinging storageforum.net [207.99.69.2] with 3000 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=131ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=132ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=130ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=131ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=139ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=136ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=134ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=134ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=133ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=131ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=129ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=139ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=138ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=137ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=126ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=125ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=114ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=112ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=89ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=130ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=138ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=3000 time=136ms TTL=47
Ping statistics for 207.99.69.2:
Packets: Sent = 39, Received = 39, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 89ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 127ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Documents and Settings\blakerwry>ping storageforum.net -l 1000 -t
Pinging storageforum.net [207.99.69.2] with 1000 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=58ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=58ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=59ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=59ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=61ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=61ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=1000 time=58ms TTL=47
Ping statistics for 207.99.69.2:
Packets: Sent = 9, Received = 9, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 58ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Documents and Settings\blakerwry>ping storageforum.net -l 2000 -t
Pinging storageforum.net [207.99.69.2] with 2000 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=100ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=107ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=77ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=105ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=103ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=112ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=102ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=91ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=88ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=107ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=107ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=106ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=102ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.99.69.2: bytes=2000 time=102ms TTL=47
Ping statistics for 207.99.69.2:
Packets: Sent = 14, Received = 14, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 77ms, Maximum = 112ms, Average = 100ms
Code:
Tracing route to storageforum.net [207.99.69.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.100
2 8 ms 9 ms 7 ms 10.62.16.1
3 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms pos6-1.kscyksgibb-rtr1.kc.rr.com [24.94.161.137]
4 10 ms 8 ms 9 ms pos1-0.lvwoksleav-rtr1.kc.rr.com [24.94.161.25]
5 10 ms 10 ms 9 ms pos1-0.kscymonort-rtr1.kc.rr.com [24.94.161.21]
6 17 ms 10 ms 11 ms pos6-0.kscymordc-rtr1.kc.rr.com [24.94.161.17]
7 11 ms 10 ms 11 ms srp14-0.kscymordc-rtr3.kc.rr.com [24.94.160.193]
8 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms srp14-0.kscymordc-rtr4.kc.rr.com [24.94.160.194]
9 10 ms 14 ms 58 ms pop1-kcy-P3-0.atdn.net [66.185.137.237]
10 83 ms 11 ms 11 ms bb1-kcy-P0-0.atdn.net [66.185.137.224]
11 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms bb1-chi-P6-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.124]
12 24 ms 25 ms 24 ms bb2-chi-P7-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.131]
13 43 ms 43 ms 43 ms bb2-vie-P10-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.215]
14 43 ms 43 ms 44 ms bb2-ash-P15-2.atdn.net [66.185.152.20]
15 44 ms 44 ms 43 ms pop2-ash-P1-0.atdn.net [66.185.139.211]
16 51 ms 49 ms 50 ms NetAccess.atdn.net [66.185.151.158]
17 50 ms 49 ms 50 ms 0195.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.138]
18 50 ms 58 ms 87 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
19 51 ms 52 ms 52 ms fa0-0.core1.pwebtech.com [207.99.8.198]
20 52 ms 51 ms 52 ms 207.99.69.2
Trace complete.Definately not a network issue.
blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
Even going to the site http://swordfish.dnsvelocity.com is rather slow considering the ping and the content of the page...
However, telnetting to port 80 and typing: "get asdfjk" promptly results in a 404 error...
It seems your server is just under too much CPU or disk load... my guess is disk... perhaps the SQL server needs reindexed or whatever it's called to optimize the database.
However, telnetting to port 80 and typing: "get asdfjk" promptly results in a 404 error...
It seems your server is just under too much CPU or disk load... my guess is disk... perhaps the SQL server needs reindexed or whatever it's called to optimize the database.
Here is a tracert when the forums are very bad. From Salem OR over a cable modem (Comcast network)
Code:
Tracing route to storageforum.net [207.99.69.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms 10.140.192.1
2 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 12.244.84.129
3 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 12.244.64.230
4 20 ms 20 ms 10 ms 12.244.72.34
5 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms gbr2-p70.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.123.44.61]
6 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms gbr4-p80.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.5.169]
7 60 ms 100 ms 60 ms gbr4-p20.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.53]
8 51 ms 60 ms 50 ms tbr1-p012501.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.9.133]
9 90 ms 90 ms 80 ms tbr1-p013601.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.57]
10 80 ms 80 ms 80 ms gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]
11 81 ms 90 ms 80 ms att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]
12 80 ms 80 ms 80 ms 1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.69]
13 80 ms 80 ms 80 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
14 111 ms 80 ms 140 ms fa0-0.core1.pwebtech.com [207.99.8.198]
15 80 ms 80 ms 81 ms 207.99.69.2
Trace complete.Here are my results for when it's slow, from about 15 miles east of where they are located.
Time to get some sleep, now.
Code:
Tracing route to storageforum.net [207.99.69.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.3
2 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms 10.104.192.1
3 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.cftnnj.cv.net [67.83.244.34]
4 7 ms 8 ms 7 ms r4-ge9-1.mhe.prnynj.cv.net [67.83.244.5]
5 9 ms 10 ms 8 ms ool-4353ef32.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.239.50]
6 12 ms 11 ms 13 ms r1-srp5-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.12.145]
7 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms r2-srp13-0.cr.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.12.100]
8 10 ms 11 ms 13 ms r2-srp5-0.in.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.12.2]
9 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms gi4-1.msfc1.tlw.nac.net [167.206.16.130]
10 12 ms 13 ms 13 ms gi4-5.msfc1.nyc.nac.net [209.123.11.229]
11 13 ms 13 ms 11 ms 0094.ge-3-0-0.gbr2.nyc.nac.net [64.21.102.13]
12 13 ms 13 ms 13 ms 1194.at-0-0-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.10]
13 14 ms 15 ms 15 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
14 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms fa0-0.core1.pwebtech.com [207.99.8.197]
15 14 ms 16 ms 15 ms 207.99.69.2
Trace complete.Time to get some sleep, now.
blakerwry
Storage? I am Storage!
forums are fast now... :zzz:
I was told they recompiled apache on the server today. I don't know what that means, but the forum seems faster now.
How's it been running today? I checked in around noon EST and it seemed fine. I peaked through my tracert collection from last night and I only see once instance of high pings. It was probably a router somewhere along the line.
How's it been running today? I checked in around noon EST and it seemed fine. I peaked through my tracert collection from last night and I only see once instance of high pings. It was probably a router somewhere along the line.
Howell
Storage? I am Storage!
Handruin said:
It means they rebuilt the program (apache) from source code into binaries instead of using prebuilt binaries. Theoretically, you can optimize the binaries for your particular hardware this way. Realisticly, unless they are using some pretty esoteric hardware it may not help much. It's a place to start though.
Can you monitor server load through the NA night? Maybe with a cron job.