Here Comes DDR-3 !

But I thought we knew this even before DD2 hit the shelves.
They (intel/amd) didn't want to adopt it because they knew something better was just around the corner. But they couldn't wait so we get DDR2.
Or maybe I was thinking of something else.
 

You are essentially correct Will. But, DDR3 wasn't originally planned (by Intel) back in 2004/5 to show up quite this early. Intel was originally talking the end of 2007 or early 2008 for a DDR3 introduction, but expect to hear in the next month or so that mid-2007 will be when DDR3 is commercially introduced -- probably in notebook / mobile computers first , then a few months later desktops and servers.

It seems that some of the larger notebook computer manufacturing folk out there (think Stevo and Mikey) want to take advantage of DDR3's better power consumption as soon as possible, not to mention the quick and easy road to 1600 MHz front-side bus speeds for desktop and server boxes.

The dark horse in the future of RAM is M-RAM (Magnetic RAM or Magneto-resistive RAM), with IBM, Toshiba, Sony, and a few others developing their respective versions M-RAM. M-RAM has the potential to be several times faster than any existing dynamic RAM -- not to mention the special ability to store data without the need for electrical power. But, the cost difference between M-RAM and dynamic RAM could end up keeping M-RAM out of the mainstream RAM market for years. The last I heard, some industry pundits were talking a 2009 introduction for volume M-RAM production. Back in 2001/2002, IBM was talking 2007 as a possible introduction for M-RAM.

One could assume that a "slow" (least expensive) grade of M-RAM might first appear (with great applause) in higher-end notebook / mobile computers, for the obvious reason that it would provide true instant on/off ability like never before. Over time, as manufacturing of M-RAM ramped up, super-speedy high-density grades of M-RAM would begin to permanently push out "old" D-RAM technology memories in all computer systems for good.



 
iGary said:
One could assume that a "slow" (least expensive) grade of M-RAM might first appear (with great applause) in higher-end notebook / mobile computers, for the obvious reason that it would provide true instant on/off ability like never before. Over time, as manufacturing of M-RAM ramped up, super-speedy high-density grades of M-RAM would begin to permanently push out "old" D-RAM technology memories in all computer systems for good.
Click to expand...

Not to mention a stable SSD...
 
Bozo said:
I can presume that DD2 and DD3 take different sockets/voltages/controllers/motherboards??
Click to expand...

I haven't followed whatever physical changes (DIMM socket) will be required, but without a doubt, the signaling and device power voltages will be going down, and the protocol between memory controller and memory device will change.




 

I don't keep up with QDR (Quad Data Rate) RAM much any more, but it's definitely alive and kicking -- mostly in the pricey world of high-end backbone routers, director-class Ethernet and Fibre-Channel switches, et cetera -- where QDR works like a champ and telecommunications tycoons are willing to pay for such.

There was a point in time a few years back where QDR was sort of being groomed as the successor to DDR or DDR2, but once the stuff hit the marketplace, price differentials pretty much snuffed out the use of QDR as mainstream computer system memory.



 
Does it cost more because not enough people buy it, or do not enough people buy it because it costs more?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top