Stereodude
Not really a
It was what $22k?I stopped watching, it was too painful. I can't buy a car until we buy a house, and we're just getting pre-approved now.
It was what $22k?I stopped watching, it was too painful. I can't buy a car until we buy a house, and we're just getting pre-approved now.
So after the second rs25 not working out, I'm moving on to other options like the subaru legacy and the acura 3.2 TL. I found a TL local to me here. Quite a few miles but it drives well and seems good when I looked at it last night. Only issue is that the 1999 to 2003 acura 3.2 TL's have a known transmission issue. This ones had the transmission replaced at 94K miles. I'm trying to figure out whether the new transmissions really fix the problem or not.
What are you driving these days? Your WRX still?
I thought that was your wife's car. :rabbit:Me? Never had a WRX. Used to have a bunch of fast stuff, but lately I've had a 2009 Audi A3 2.0T Quattro.
And what exactly are you after these days?The longer I wait, the larger my car budget gets. At some point, the amount I can spend will intersect with a car that I want. Seems to currently sit in the ~$30k range.
Will, from an identity theft perspective, you might want to blur or mask your license plate number.
So, now that we've got another year of data under our belt would you care to revise your claims since the data clearly shows Cash for Clunkers drove up used car prices? linkCARS did not take cheaper cars off the market. The traded clunkers were in service and weren't on the market to begin with. Sans CARS a good portion would still be in service. Article:
Besides, the US has over 170 million cars on the road. CARS took just under 700K and junked them so the number of vehicles went down by less than 1/2 of 1 percent. Any effect this has on the used car market will be temporary. Prices on new cars, which did spike some during CARS, are already moving back to pre-CARS levels.
To try and stay on topic, if you look at the results the vehicles taken off the road would not be candidates for Will. Price-wise, perhaps, but from a fuel economy standpoint and also from a cost to maintain standpoint they would be very poor choices.
They took ~700,000 sub $5k cars off the market that "poor" people would have bought leading to a scarcity of sub $5k cars which in turn drove up prices. I'm not saying C4C was the only factor that drove up used car prices, but it clearly was a prime participant.But of mostly older cars that wouldn't be good used car purchase candidates.
They took ~700,000 sub $5k cars off the market that "poor" people would have bought leading to a scarcity of sub $5k cars which in turn drove up prices.
I don't think they're bringing to the US.
A bicycle (maybe with an electric motor)?There has to be a better way.
Turn the wrench yourself.There has to be a better way.
The maintenance is still complimentary on my cars, but after that expires, were I to have it done at the dealership, I would be spending $500-$750 every 10k miles.
That's the one.Or does your dealer charge ridiculous prices for oil changes?
Wow. What kind of car is that?