I'm interested as well. I haven't seen the usual tech sites do write-ups on them.
Edit: I'm looking to saturate a single GbE port.
The Synchology has a bad history of dying with blue light of death or something like that.
Then the second, backup, NAS could be connected to the GbE switch and even the whoreless.
Yes, I meant directly to the dual Intel. If it is possible to achieve 150-200MB/s, that is a major improvement over ~100.
Then the second, backup, NAS could be connected to the GbE switch and even the whoreless.
Yes, I meant directly to the dual Intel. If it is possible to achieve 150-200MB/s, that is a major improvement over ~100.
Then the second, backup, NAS could be connected to the GbE switch and even the whoreless.
You never want anything that's bottlenecked by bandwidth to happen over whoreless. Whoreless connections are slow, no matter what the specs say. When you need bandwidth, make sure there are lots of whores. The highest quality whores you can find.
Filled a Synology 1812+ with 3TB Seagates I had sitting around (7200RPM).
Isn't RAID4 slower then RAID5? The parity disk is a bottleneck and the same amount of math is done for both.Basically the Synology RAID is as I recall a variant on RAID4. So there's one disk dedicated to parity information. Since Parity isn't calculated for all writes, only for the parity disk, it's going to be faster than RAID5.
Can you use the dual port NIC?Filled a Synology 1812+ with 3TB Seagates I had sitting around (7200RPM). Allowed it to create the default array, which it states as "Synology Hybrid RAID with 1 disk of fault-tolerance). Connected with a single NIC to a GbE switch and I'm getting 99MB/s writes to the array. Not bad at all.