update New server issue thread
- Thread starter Handruin
- Start date
timwhit
Hairy Aussie
Yeah, this is much, much better. Way to go Doug!
udaman
Wannabe Storage Freak
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2006
- Messages
- 1,209
Lol, Handy... u-da-man!:bravo:
It's more like going from a older browser, to say Safari 4.0 beta; it's a little faster, but not much can make a dialup connection seem faster---I'm still sufferin. Though I have had some d/l's on 10+MB files go 1.5-2x on some sites...still not fast enough to d/l any of Merc's fav vid. pr0n
. You need a very fast connection to d/l some of those combo Mac OS X updates for Intel machines now, they're headed towards 1GB now.Test will be if there are no more double posts...for those who are not inebriated
<edit>and it still takes about 2min from time I hit submit post button, leaving me less than 3min to do an edit, which as you know, is barely enough for those who are "Twitter Challenged"
<edit>Lunar might already be seeing some double post issues, but I've not seen any abnormal delays from the time I press submit to the time the post is entered into the forum. With the old server we would see 10+ seconds at times...here it's 1-2 seconds from post.
Flood control is enabled for 5 seconds so if you get trigger happy during that time it should stop you. Hopefully we won't be seeing any more 30+ second posts. The servers are also on the west cost now (CA) so they may be closer to you.
Stereodude
Not really a
Leave it to udaman to find a way to plug Apple in a post about the new sever.
BTW, it's much faster Handy!
BTW, it's much faster Handy!
ddrueding
Fixture
Running great, thanks Handy!
No way. It's Linux CentOS.
Bozo
Storage? I am Storage!
Super! The new server is great. Fast!
Howell
Storage? I am Storage!
So I now have this problem with a rash. And my cankles are swelling much more. Can we go back to the old server. <smirk>
mubs
Storage? I am Storage!
Yup, it's much, much faster (and I'm 12k miles away from CA). Thanks Handy!
12K MiLEs>: :???:
ddrueding
Fixture
The Subcontinent, IIRC.
Can you guys check something for me? What IP address do you resolve if you ping the following:
www.handruin.com
www.franticdownstream.com
For me, handruin.com resolves to the old IP (208.99.113.119). It should be resolving to (67.222.3.121).
I can't even get franticdownstream.com to ping anything which is odd.
Any thoughts why I'm getting some domains to resolve to the correct IP, and others still go to the old? Would DNS propagation really spread out like that for my ISP? Timwhit gave me the trick to do dnsflush on my machine but it hasn't helped.
www.handruin.com
www.franticdownstream.com
For me, handruin.com resolves to the old IP (208.99.113.119). It should be resolving to (67.222.3.121).
I can't even get franticdownstream.com to ping anything which is odd.
Any thoughts why I'm getting some domains to resolve to the correct IP, and others still go to the old? Would DNS propagation really spread out like that for my ISP? Timwhit gave me the trick to do dnsflush on my machine but it hasn't helped.
ddrueding
Fixture
ddrueding
Fixture
DNS propogation is a lot like wireless, which is a lot like magic. There is a reason for everything going on, but there is no way to know enough about the situation to be able to explain why everything happens the way it does.
The last freakish DNS issue I had was that a local ISP had the idea that they were the authoritative DNS server for my domain. Anyone on their servers (or using their mail servers) didn't get to me until I sent them a nastygram.
The last freakish DNS issue I had was that a local ISP had the idea that they were the authoritative DNS server for my domain. Anyone on their servers (or using their mail servers) didn't get to me until I sent them a nastygram.
udaman
Wannabe Storage Freak
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2006
- Messages
- 1,209
Didn't try to ping
^^^implies both urls link to same address, which implies when you click on both you should get the same webpage?
I got Handy's blog on the 1st just 5min before I typed out this post,
got this message on the 2nd:
*edit* : though it only took me 40sec this time before the page loaded to completion before I hit the edit button...typing this as fast as I can, think I still have 3+min to edit...how many more characters can I type?
^^^implies both urls link to same address, which implies when you click on both you should get the same webpage?
I got Handy's blog on the 1st just 5min before I typed out this post,
got this message on the 2nd:
*edit* : though it only took me 40sec this time before the page loaded to completion before I hit the edit button...typing this as fast as I can, think I still have 3+min to edit...how many more characters can I type
?Yes, every website I host uses the same IP address. It's done through apache's name-based virtual hosts which is very common. That means you should not get the same web page when you visit via domain name.
Both are resolving to 67.223.3.121
Fushigi
Storage Is My Life
Comcasts's DNS servers resolve to the 67. address for both.
mubs
Storage? I am Storage!
Both resolve to 67.222.3.121 for me, using company provided DNS servers (and I'm far, far away).
udaman
Wannabe Storage Freak
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2006
- Messages
- 1,209
Uh, so what just happened 15-30min ago when I couldn't get the site? clicked on browser history link for main index, browser came up with error message that site was not available?
Heh, site sure is fast now. Almost like having a slow DSL or cable connection. (will probably be a bit faster once I start up from my OS X 10.5.6 partition and use Safari Beta 4... woot! think of how many posts and long rants and edits I can do now...you've unleashed a Pandora's box )
Now if Handy can just get all the other sites running this fast....
Heh, site sure is fast now
. Almost like having a slow DSL or cable connection. (will probably be a bit faster once I start up from my OS X 10.5.6 partition and use Safari Beta 4... woot! think of how many posts and long rants and edits I can do now...you've unleashed a Pandora's box )Now if Handy can just get all the other sites running this fast...
.
Last edited:
This is our new SF server that I have full control over:
root@host [~]# uptime
22:14:59 up 309 days, 22:46, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00
It's still possible the network could have gone down, but this hosting company is known to have very high uptime figures.
root@host [~]# uptime
22:14:59 up 309 days, 22:46, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00
It's still possible the network could have gone down, but this hosting company is known to have very high uptime figures.
timwhit
Hairy Aussie
It could be uda's crappy connection.
Let me know if you notice any weirdness. I like that my posts go through in seconds and there's no stupid weirdness during the days where it takes 30 seconds to load a page.
Seems like you guys have been posting a lot more since the move, but it could just be my imagination.
Seems like you guys have been posting a lot more since the move, but it could just be my imagination.
See what you have done. :lol: