Interesting to see that thought process about SoftBank, as I had an interesting skirmish with them last year and eventually had that brought to a close that was not so bad for both them and I, but only after a gentle bit of a push from the CEO and the assigning of one of their smarter management folks to the case. But the opening phase of that skirmish did surprise me, and only because of what seemed like too much of a lockstep style in their middle management ranks. Kind of reminded me of the military style of how to get things done.
Of course, I am fully aware of that style being the norm with many Japanese companies for so many years, but I had, until last year, thought that SoftBank had departed from that style and developed a more think-on-your-feet style, instead of "
Here's the playbook and rigid adherence to it is required."
This is worthy of note:
... and Softbank is where bad ideas go to die.
Lucky for me I keep a Net log of all my activities, so I can set that aside in an existing log for later contemplation. That's worthy of extra thought.
First thought is you've nailed that one.
But it makes me wonder when they got in the wrong lane on that particular giant corporate freeway that passes through the Japanese sphere of influence? I doubt I'll live long enough to be able to properly find the answer.
But as the admin tools show on this site, I am definitely still tied to them. Have been ever since they bought Yahoo's assets here in Japan. Heck, they (SoftBank) went to great lengths to justify why I couldn't keep my static IP address. What a bummer that was. So many years with one, and then
'POOF' taken away. Well, I mean at a reasonable cost. Cost is everything, right?