photoshop witchcraft

udaman

Wannabe Storage Freak
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
1,209
Yes, but as u will note, this is being done on a Mac OS X special version of PS. So you'll have to "Get a Mac" :p (ducks for PC crowd trying to clobber me... wha it's not OT, completely relevant)

Did U see the comment field?

  • boulabiar This exists in Gimp since 2 years ago !!
    watch?v=0AoobQQBeVc
    Gimp plugin : Resynthesizer
    Author : Paul Harrison 13 hours ago

Too bad the current 1Ghz A4 CPU in the iPad doesn't have the grunt to do full PS CS5 :), but then neither does the competition.

(still waiting 4evah on the dialup d/l :( to see the 'magic')
 

mubs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Nov 22, 2002
Messages
4,908
Location
Somewhere in time.
That was cool.

I know Youtube changed their interface. How does one download videos now? The url link field is gone. I tried "Copy Flash Location" and pasted that in Keepvid, and it didn;t work.
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
Pirating it, making sure it half as good as that, then buying a copy with the proceeds from my first sale using the program?
Since you're going to pay full price eventually, I won't bother offering it to you at a discount. Thanks for helping pay the bills next quarter, tho'.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
They are many ways to manipulate images, but I'm not into that artistic stuff. Most of my best prints are from TIFF scans in PS6 or DPP TIFF conversions in PS6/PS7 and with the use of three critical plug-ins. The main reason I use CS2 now is that I grew tired of keeping separate files for the 16-bit images rather than keeping them in layers.

The only interest I'd have in CS5 is if file saves use multiple cores, unlike CS4 and previous versions, which do not. :(
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,747
Location
Horsens, Denmark
This particular feature is something that would interest me, as it would improve the quality of my pictures. "Garbage clean up" is something I don't do at the moment, and if it were that easy, I would.
 

mubs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Nov 22, 2002
Messages
4,908
Location
Somewhere in time.
Thanks Handy & CityK. They got rid of the URL box, but just copying the URL in the browser URL box works now, and it didn't before. Keepvid is asking to install some crap now, but Handy's Savevideo.me wrks fine.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,747
Location
Horsens, Denmark
In this case I mean it quite literally. If my composition is poor, or the location dirty, there may be a piece of garbage or trash in the frame. It is often the case on the beach or in parks or stadiums, that trash will be in the picture. If cleaning up the image was as simple as this makes it appear to be, then my images would be better for it.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,303
Location
I am omnipresent
Personally, I would have laughed my ass off if you had continued with "and selling copies in Chinatown for a buck a pop" or something to that effect :p

What did people in Chinatown do to deserve having to pay in order to have Adobe shit inflicted on them?
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
In this case I mean it quite literally. If my composition is poor, or the location dirty, there may be a piece of garbage or trash in the frame. It is often the case on the beach or in parks or stadiums, that trash will be in the picture. If cleaning up the image was as simple as this makes it appear to be, then my images would be better for it.

Ah so. PS CS5 appears to contain a type of auto-retouching tool. It can hardly improve composition per se. Yet it would be fabulous if there were an option to remove those pesky humans from an image. :)
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,747
Location
Horsens, Denmark
Ah so. PS CS5 appears to contain a type of auto-retouching tool. It can hardly improve composition per se. Yet it would be fabulous if there were an option to remove those pesky humans from an image. :)

That is exactly what I am talking about. They have managed to come up with another feature that is worth paying money for. Microsoft could learn a thing or two there...
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
Well, you can test it out and let us know if Abobe figured out how to save a file with more than one core utilized. I am amazed to find that it runs on XP.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
OMG, that example awful. The retouching is designed for smaller areas.
It underscores the fact that there is no way to recreate missing info.
 

Handruin

Administrator
Joined
Jan 13, 2002
Messages
13,931
Location
USA
Sorry mubs. I said don't click the link if you were at all concerned! :) Even adobe can't fake boobs.
 

mubs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Nov 22, 2002
Messages
4,908
Location
Somewhere in time.
My disappoint was not with the type of content displayed but with CS5 being unable to fill in the non-visible areas!
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,747
Location
Horsens, Denmark
I'm missing the joke.

In CS6 I demand improvements in the content aware software that allows it to accurately create porn where there wasn't any.

Just imagine some of the awesome by-products; run it frame-by-frame on your favorite movie and get....your favorite movie with naked people!
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
The more examples I see, the less impressed I am. The tool has its uses, but sometimes goes nuts. Even when it works fairly well there is often some manual cleanup to be done afterwards. There is surely a learning curve.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
In CS6 I demand improvements in the content aware software that allows it to accurately create porn where there wasn't any.

Just imagine some of the awesome by-products; run it frame-by-frame on your favorite movie and get....your favorite movie with naked people!

How could it do that? There could have to be library of potential images, but they would not representative of the realities.
 

Stinker

What is this storage?
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
95
Since you're going to pay full price eventually, I won't bother offering it to you at a discount. Thanks for helping pay the bills next quarter, tho'.

You work for Adobe? That would explain a lot if you do! :rofl:
 
Top