OK, I'll bite for a minute.
I'll start by saying the countries he blocked haven't produced a terrorist that have attacked the USA in some time. There have been multiple terrorist attacks by US citizens here during that time though.
Do we have to be successfully attacked by people from those countries recently before we take a closer look at who we're admitting from them? We can't look at attempted attacks or attacks on countries outside the US or even what's going on in the countries themselves? Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen are all places that are either hotbeds for terrorism with little to no organized gov't in control of the entire country or where the countries are state sponsors of terrorism, but I guess until your fellow countrymen bleed that doesn't matter.
He "accidentally" blocked people with visas and green cards from entering and someone directed the CBP to ignore court orders.
Sure, the roll out and implementation didn't go smoothly, but you can't find me any evidence that he or high ranking officials in his administration directed the CBP to ignore court orders.
He, and his administration have been outright lying for quite some time now about whatever they feel like, whenever they feel like it. I'm not going to look it up and provide you examples, you can find them on your own if you get out of your echo chamber. I'm talking about him saying stuff on his own twitter account, or on camera, then later saying he never said them. This isn't ok by any politician, and it shouldn't be the accepted norm.
First, I don't concede this point, but arguing back and forth about this will become a sideshow unto itself as we take it specific issue by issue / topic by topic where you'll start pulling up articles written by the propagandist wing of the democrat party, otherwise known as the mainstream media, and as I debunk them you'll accuse me using articles from my echo chamber that are wrong or lying. Or, we'll end up in a petty semantics discussion about what was actually said vs. meant vs. implied vs. dog whistled vs. whatever. So there's no point even starting down that road.
I'm not going to waste anymore time on this, these are just a few examples. The man is untrustworthy, temperamental, and has a fragile ego on a level never before seen by anyone with so much power.
And not a one of those points explains why it's a bad idea to more closely vet people from certain countries. It's basically, rah, rah, rah, Trump = bad. Your irrational hatred for the man has blinded you. It's apparently going to be a tough 8 years for many and a really entertaining 8 years for others.
Carl Bildt on Twitter: