Groltz
My demeaning user rank is
You guys might enjoy. (But will most likely just complain about)
http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q4/chipset-raid/index.x?pg=1
http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q4/chipset-raid/index.x?pg=1
RAID vs single drive performance article
- Thread starter Groltz
- Start date
Tannin
0
obligatory complaint, just for the record
(Huh? Tannin, you can't just complain, you have to complain about something in particular.)
(Yes I can. In fact, I just did.)
Also, in case I didn't mention it yet, I want to complain. That's a general, one size fits all complaint. Keep it handy and apply it to whichever topic seems to merit it, or else just use it as a Tannin is generally complaining complaint.
(Huh? Tannin, you can't just complain, you have to complain about something in particular.)
(Yes I can. In fact, I just did.)
Also, in case I didn't mention it yet, I want to complain. That's a general, one size fits all complaint. Keep it handy and apply it to whichever topic seems to merit it, or else just use it as a Tannin is generally complaining complaint.
Undirected complaints become complaint credits, which can be applied as desired...
You mean the one that was against raid 5 or something like that?
sechs
0
Why hasn't anyone published a one drive versus two drives article?
People might start putting a second drive in their system and not using it for RAID!
People might start putting a second drive in their system and not using it for RAID!
time
0
Probably me in this thread, and specifically BAARF.LiamC said:
It's not just Oracle that runs poorly on RAID 5 - any OLTP database will struggle - but the logistics arguments hold for all platforms, particularly as the number of spindles rises.
No wonder I couldn't find it, no mention of raid in the page title!