Something Random

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,275
Location
I am omnipresent
3185786-7082161109-13008.jpg


And a link to the relevant wiki page.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,275
Location
I am omnipresent
I'd like to postulate a new theory for determining the quality of electronics:

If you have to peel a layer of plastic off something to protect its glossy black finish, it's probably a piece of crap.
 

P5-133XL

Xmas '97
Joined
Jan 15, 2002
Messages
3,173
Location
Salem, Or
Even the best products use that plastic to protect their finishes so unless you want to label everything as crap it is probably not the best distinguishing marker.
 

P5-133XL

Xmas '97
Joined
Jan 15, 2002
Messages
3,173
Location
Salem, Or
I have a different observed pattern:

Find the base minimum price for any product and double it and that is the price point where some quality products exist though you may have to know something to find it. 3x base is where conspicuous consumption begins.

The above does not conflict with Sturgeon's law because 90% of people buy at less than 2x trying to find the bargains of the world.

Note, none of these theory's have to do with a plastic coating protecting the finish. So I contend that your's is a new theory.
 

jtr1962

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 25, 2002
Messages
4,374
Location
Flushing, New York
I use a different methodology. If it's heavily advertised it may or may not be crap but it's probably grossly overpriced (i.e. most Apple products). If it's stupidly cheap it's almost certainly crap but very occasionally you'll get great products at bargain basement prices. If you want quality for not too much money look for unadvertised products which are just above the lowest tier in price. Here you often find real bargains. I find as you move further up the price ladder often you're just paying for additional features you may or may not need, not quality. And yes, the highest prices are conspicuous consumption. One unfortunate fact is that nowadays paying a high price is never a guarantee of quality. More often than not you're just paying for a name or slick advertising. Therefore, it's best to avoid the highest-priced items even if you can afford them.

Another trick I use is to find what you want, and then just wait for specials. I never pay full retail price for anything. I don't need to be the first one on the block to have it. In fact, I'm more than happy to wait for the next iteration to come out in order to get the next to last version for a bargain price. Another good reason to wait is because the kinks are usually worked out by then. To me it adds insult to injury when you pay a high price for something cutting edge only to be a beta tester.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,729
Location
Horsens, Denmark
My favorite trick is to find the cheap brand equivalent of the expensive brand (Denon and Marantz have many models that are just branded differently).
 

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,729
Location
Québec, Québec
This map shows that winds where of category 1 in Paugie's region. He might have severe damages to his property, but this shouldn't be life-threatening.

800px-YolandaPSWS.png
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,275
Location
I am omnipresent
Rationally, he's probably fine but I'd like to hear his account of things once he pops up again.
Seems like there are no end of natural disasters there though.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,275
Location
I am omnipresent
A few months ago, Google started requiring a G+ login to leave feedback for apps on the Play Store.
Now Google requires a G+ login to comment on Youtube videos.

I have a strong negative reaction to social networking generally, but moreover I cannot see the benefit to enforcing a connection between a real-world identity and an online one in order to use those specific parts of the Google ecosystem when I already have Google IDs that are functionally already an authorization to access Google services. Is this anything other than an opportunistic attempt to increase the per-user value for Google datamining? Is there anyone here who actually gets some meaningful value from their G+ account?
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,275
Location
I am omnipresent
Maybe they are trying to increase the quality of YouTube comments?

I don't care if that's what they're doing. Trolls will continue to make throw-away troll accounts. They're actively preventing formerly valid and useful communication by creating a two-tiered system for users who choose to use some Google products but not others.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,729
Location
Horsens, Denmark
I get asked for a card about once a week. I hand out probably one a month. On average, those who I've given a card are worth about $2500 to me over time. These cards cost about $2/ea in the small quantities I order, but are totally worth it IMHO. I'm having the guy who makes the paper (yes, that is to spec by a craftsman as well, mostly linen fibers actually - like US currency) experiment with embedding an RFID chip in the paper itself. The printer is also up for milling a QR code die for me for the next batch (probably on the back).
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,729
Location
Horsens, Denmark
I like the clean design, but who gives out business cards anymore?

One of the most profitable parts of my business is helping wealthy yet technically illiterate people get up to speed just enough that they aren't embarrassed. My most recent client does real estate and is succesful enough to own a Citation V but has an @aol.com email address and wants to be able to Skype with his grandkids. The idea is that if you ask for a business card you really need my help.
 
Last edited:
Top