I'm pretty sure I'm a professional babysitter. I have to personally test projects my coworkers are working on for my customers. Otherwise they hand it to me and tell me it's working when it doesn't even pass the most abbreviated end to end test. Further, if I don't sit with them in the lab and participate in "work" stuff doesn't get fixed or done in a timely fashion.
A lot of that is the fault of companies which partition tasks off to whomever they think can do it. If you do a particular task well, then you get stuck doing that task and nothing else. End result is employees who only see themselves useful for one or two functions in a company. IIRC, Japanese companies tend to move their employees around to increase their versatility, keep them from getting bored, and let them see the overall functioning of the company. This is a much better model if you ask me. It may also decrease employee turnover.I was talking to a coworker about this. It seems some employees consider themselves responsible for performing a task, while others consider themselves responsible for providing a solution. The former is not worth having as an employee, IMHO.
Putting me in HR would be quite a show. I'm less certain it would decrease employees turnover though.IIRC, Japanese companies tend to move their employees around to increase their versatility, keep them from getting bored, and let them see the overall functioning of the company. This is a much better model if you ask me. It may also decrease employee turnover.
Putting me in HR would be quite a show. I'm less certain it would decrease employees turnover though.
... and my wife on Saturday was told there is a 99% chance she has MS. She just needs a Lumbar Puncture done to confirm a few things, as the MRIs are showing very-very small lesions (almost too small to see, so they are not 100% on the MS diagnosis, but are using the LP to confirm the inflammation of the spinal cord and test on the fluid itself).
There's very little turnover in Japan because of the culture. People just don't change jobs, and companies don't lay people off (not sure if the latter is the law or driven by cultural norms). Of course none of that changes that in general Japanese companies don't understand how to do business outside of Japan. Most of their industries have been decimated by competition and are limping along under the crushing weight of the policies driven by those cultural norms.IIRC, Japanese companies tend to move their employees around to increase their versatility, keep them from getting bored, and let them see the overall functioning of the company. This is a much better model if you ask me. It may also decrease employee turnover.
And the year is off to a great start...
And the year is off to a great start...
A lot of that is the fault of companies which partition tasks off to whomever they think can do it. If you do a particular task well, then you get stuck doing that task and nothing else. End result is employees who only see themselves useful for one or two functions in a company. IIRC, Japanese companies tend to move their employees around to increase their versatility, keep them from getting bored, and let them see the overall functioning of the company. This is a much better model if you ask me. It may also decrease employee turnover.
I'm very sorry to hear that Chewy. That's a very emotional and challenging situation that both of you have to handle. Thanks for sharing it with us and I hope that you and your wife's spirits can stay high through these challenging times. I hope for the best for you both.And the year is off to a great start...
Everyone has areas where they're talented and not talented. I wouldn't be all that great in HR, either. I'd probably end up running it like the drill sergeant in "Full Metal Jacket".Putting me in HR would be quite a show. I'm less certain it would decrease employees turnover though.
Those things are very important if you want to retain quality employees. That's actually why I gave up on working for someone else only 6 years out of college. I couldn't find a place willing to pay me a decent salary to start, and which also had the potential to let me go as far as my abilities would let me. Sad to say, most places see even high-level workers as disposable assets which aren't worth investing time or training into.I quit my last job because I did the same thing for 5 years and there was no scope for growth, personal, professional or for the organization. And I was in a very senior role.
Not all aspects of the Japanese model should be emulated. Lifetime employee largely is a cultural thing there. On the face of it, this isn't a bad idea. If you commit to a company it will commit to you. The downside of course is when employees don't work out well. The company is stuck with them. One of the models for lifetime employment has the least well performing worker out of every ten at each pay grade voluntarily quitting. That helps, but it's not as good as being allowed to hire/fire workers anytime. That said, I feel American companies go too far in the other direction. It's increasingly common for companies to lay off competent senior workers for no reason other than they can hire two or three college graduates for the same amount. Head count isn't everything.There's very little turnover in Japan because of the culture. People just don't change jobs, and companies don't lay people off (not sure if the latter is the law or driven by cultural norms). Of course none of that changes that in general Japanese companies don't understand how to do business outside of Japan. Most of their industries have been decimated by competition and are limping along under the crushing weight of the policies driven by those cultural norms.
I'm thinking here that they either hired too many less than qualified people, or just switched people way too often. It's true that some jobs can't be mastered quickly. The rotation schedule should reflect that. Also, there are some specialized positions which really take years or decades to master. Those are not amenable to rotation, but they usually consist of enough diverse tasks to keep the person doing them from getting stale. Another factor is pay. Management thinks it's so wonderful when they find people for $8 an hour. Of course, it isn't when a competent worker can replace 3 or 4 of them, or other employees have to constantly correct their mistakes. That was actually an issue at most places I worked. I told management as diplomatically as I could to get rid of the screw ups and pay those who remained at least twice as much. Chances are good we could have handled the workload. They never saw it that way. The typical response was "Look, we know they're not much better than nothing but they're cheap". That was usually the signal that it was time to leave. I know for a fact at least one of these companies was out of business a few years later. They loved to spend $$$ sending top sales people on trips to already established customers who were going to order from us anyway but they hated paying the people who actually did the grunt work decent wages. The biggest insult was when they closed the NYC shop but asked me to relocate to Virginia. Not that I was seriously considering it anyway, but they didn't offer me even a cent more than the lousy $10.94 an hour they were paying me.The company that I used to work for does this. Turnover is terrible with most employees lasting about 5 years. The quality of the product we manufacture suffers too. The saying "Jack of all trades, Master on none" comes to mind. The employee never gets a chance to get a 'feel' for the process where they are working. Because management is also being shuffled you end up with supervisors that have never worked on the production floor making decisions based on a 'best guess' scenario or 'team decisions', whatever that is. The solution from management is to write SOPs. They believe that you can hirer anyone of the street, hand that person an SOP and they can do the job.
It seems to me almost everyone takes pride in what they do, striving to be their best. But with constantly being shuffled around the attitude becomes 'just follow the SOP'.
Maybe the culture in Japan is different enough to allow the changing of jobs all the time, but not here.
And the year is off to a great start...
On Wednesday, my wife went for a follow up with her treatment specialist team, and has been told that she has breast cancer (stage 2, non-operable). A lesion (attached to a lymph node in her left breast) has appeared in the last 2 months, and MRIs and blood tests have confirmed that the cancer has matastised beyond the initial site. She's already started hormone therapy, and will start radiation treatment next week for 6 weeks, followed by chemotherapy there after. The oncology team assigned to her are hoping that radiation/chemo will shrink the cancer back to a point were they can do surgery to remove the growth. (It's means a double mastectomy for her).
The only decent news to come out of all the tests she's had recently, is they diagnosis of MS may be incorrect, and symptoms attributed to the breast cancer, a severe case of Rheumatoid arthritis and her Crohn's disease, coupled with re-occurrence of epilepsy. (She has epilepsy as a child, but it went away at 5/6 yrs of age. It reappeared after the birth of our daughter, but has been successfully treated with mild medication since). Once treatment for the breast cancer has completed, they will retest for MS just to make sure.
All of this coming after beating bowel cancer less than 12 months ago has taken a strain on her emotionally, as one can imagine. (Incidentally, during her treatment for bowel cancer, they did note two dormant lesions in her left breast, but left them in place, as they weren't doing anything. The oncology team she has now also noted these lesions are still there dormant, and suspect the Biological Treatment she had for bowel cancer actually kept these two lesions dormant all this time. But alas a third lesion has now appeared, and has spread).
Such is life...
Such is life...
That's very unfortunate news. I hope things get better for you and your wife.And the year is off to a great start...
So much for progress, eh?
...<snip>...
Despite being at the cutting edge in so many respects, the US is so backward in some areas it's mind boggling.
Aah, sir, but if the card is bogus, it's the merchant that has to eat the loss, not MC or Visa. This type of thinking is typically short-term. If the merchants want to be around for the long haul, they need to time-travel to the present era. That includes that behemoth, Amz.Consumer protections don't increase profits so why implement them. Just raise fees to cover costs.