Stereodude
Not really a
Did you ever get one? I'm thinking I want more pixels than 1920x1200.Hmmm, Dell U2711 looks interesting, 27" 2560*1440 led backlit with dvi and hdmi. Need to wait for rev a02 so they can get the bugs out.
Did you ever get one? I'm thinking I want more pixels than 1920x1200.Hmmm, Dell U2711 looks interesting, 27" 2560*1440 led backlit with dvi and hdmi. Need to wait for rev a02 so they can get the bugs out.
Did you ever get one? I'm thinking I want more pixels than 1920x1200.
3D is a total gimmick. Hollywood can cram it where the sun doesn't shine.Though at this point in time I won't be buying anything that doesn't support 120Hz input via HDMI for 3D support.
George Lucas is already working on that.They could do a 3D colonectomy. :hurl:
3D is a total gimmick. Hollywood can cram it where the sun doesn't shine.
Edge lit LED? I thought they still sucked. The corners are too bright in the dark scenes.
I don't see it. It's one thing to be go to a movie, and watch a 3D movie, it's another to sit in front of a monitor, or TV, and fool your brains concept of depth perception, with no knowledge of the long term effects.
I've tried the various setups at Costco, and, been seriously underwhelmed. Some of the Blu-rays I've got are pretty close to 3D in depth on the Vizio 37" already.
I'm not real convinced that 120MHZ is much more then a marketing gimic.
Even if you have 120MHZ, you need drivers and Nvidia testing to work with their 3D, and, that means Mitsubishi.
What are your thoughts on 50+? I'm happy enough if my eyes both focus on the same general area now. :spiderman:
So, I'm on the fence about purchasing a Dell U2711. There is coupon right now that takes it down to $825 w/ free shipping (but 6% sales tax ). It's been cheaper before, but not in the past 6 months or so. The forthcoming Samsung SA850 sounds interesting with PLS, but I think it's a glossy monitor and I don't do glossy.
It has 1920x1080 pixels. You need to find the mode on the TV that gives 1:1 pixel mapping instead of overscan.1. Doesn't have 1920x1080 pixels. If you set the screen to "16x9" and give it 1920x1080 it runs way over on the sides. According to the nVidia scaling program, it is closer to 1850x975. If you set the TV to "fit" mode the scaling is obvious, and makes even large text painful to look at.
It has 1920x1080 pixels. You need to find the mode on the TV that gives 1:1 pixel mapping instead of overscan.
Besides the image quality issues with plasma is the massive power consumption.
I'm currently torn between these for my main home computer. I do actually want HDMI to the monitor and a headphone jack on the screen itself, but I should wait until I've sobered up before I actually buy anything.
there isn't one. believe me, I'm familiar with that setting. the options are:
16x9
4x3
fit
dynamic 1
dynamic 2
i tried them all.
Bleh, they are 16:9 with very small pixel pitch. Why not get a proper 30" monitor?