Mercutio
Fatwah on Western Digital
I have a Hyper-V host with four Samsung 850 Pro drives in it, each home to a guest OS install and nothing else. There's also a Intel SSD with the host OS install, but the host is perfectly well behaved and in fact I think it's only ever restarted for Windows Updates maybe five times, total.
Two of the hosts have low-use databases on them. Both of those machines are acting "weird" (full disk backups fail, the databases detach etc) on an irregular basis, and the errors in question suggest to me a disk-based cause.
Samsung doesn't have an official diagnostic app for these drives, but they've been in place for over a year and according to wear leveling, the misbehaving VMs are both on drives at 99% health, having each written less than 1TB of data. BUT Samsung Drive Magician (on the Hyper-V host) says three of the four Samsung drives in the system, in spite of having "Good" status by SMART data, have extremely high, failed Unrecoverable Read Error rates.
Checks with Crystal Disk Info and WinDFT do not corroborate this and show all drives and SMART data (both by raw and interpreted values) as good.
I can't find anything wrong with any of these guys at a software level and it really bothers me that Samsung's kinda-sorta vendor tool is showing problems when nothing else is.
Given that, does it make sense to replace those drives?
Two of the hosts have low-use databases on them. Both of those machines are acting "weird" (full disk backups fail, the databases detach etc) on an irregular basis, and the errors in question suggest to me a disk-based cause.
Samsung doesn't have an official diagnostic app for these drives, but they've been in place for over a year and according to wear leveling, the misbehaving VMs are both on drives at 99% health, having each written less than 1TB of data. BUT Samsung Drive Magician (on the Hyper-V host) says three of the four Samsung drives in the system, in spite of having "Good" status by SMART data, have extremely high, failed Unrecoverable Read Error rates.
Checks with Crystal Disk Info and WinDFT do not corroborate this and show all drives and SMART data (both by raw and interpreted values) as good.
I can't find anything wrong with any of these guys at a software level and it really bothers me that Samsung's kinda-sorta vendor tool is showing problems when nothing else is.
Given that, does it make sense to replace those drives?