Toshiba 7200rpm 4 gig, about 200 MB/sec
- Thread starter Santilli
- Start date
What's your testing methodology? You could be seeing page caching from the OS.
I'm puzzled how a tiny 4GB drive can make those numbers.
Stereodude
Not really a
I think he probably meant the terrible bytes. :rotfl:
Stereodude
Not really a
I think the free version of HD tune only tests to 2TB.
Chewy509
Wotty wot wot.
We use some of the 2TB Toshiba's (DT01ACA200) at work, and we also see ~170-180MB/s sustained off them. (Reads 170-180MB/s, writes 160-170MB/s, with both slowing as we get towards the end of the platter)...
Block size = 64K, queue depth approx ~128 (avgrq-sz), file size is 500GB-1TB+. (OS = Ubuntu 14.04.3LTS).
eg (iostat output).
Code:
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rMB/s wMB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdf 80.12 0.00 5.36 0.00 0.33 0.00 126.75 0.01 1.32 1.32 0.00 0.37 0.20
sdf 39360.00 0.00 2624.00 0.00 164.00 0.00 128.00 3.78 1.44 1.44 0.00 0.38 100.00
sdf 43170.00 0.00 2878.00 0.00 179.88 0.00 128.00 3.86 1.34 1.34 0.00 0.35 100.00
sdf 42600.00 0.00 2840.00 0.00 177.50 0.00 128.00 3.75 1.32 1.32 0.00 0.35 100.00
sdf 44340.00 0.00 2956.00 0.00 184.75 0.00 128.00 3.78 1.28 1.28 0.00 0.34 100.00
sdf 45069.00 0.00 3006.00 0.00 187.88 0.00 128.00 3.81 1.27 1.27 0.00 0.33 100.00
sdf 40461.00 0.00 2696.00 0.00 168.50 0.00 128.00 3.73 1.38 1.38 0.00 0.37 100.00
sdf 41610.00 0.00 2774.00 0.00 173.38 0.00 128.00 3.76 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.36 100.00
sdf 44970.00 0.00 2998.00 0.00 187.38 0.00 128.00 3.79 1.26 1.26 0.00 0.33 100.00
sdf 42270.00 0.00 2818.00 0.00 176.12 0.00 128.00 3.82 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.35 100.00
sdf 44760.00 0.00 2984.00 0.00 186.50 0.00 128.00 3.80 1.27 1.27 0.00 0.34 100.00
sdf 42120.00 0.00 2809.00 0.00 175.62 0.00 128.04 3.77 1.34 1.34 0.00 0.36 100.00
sdf 39900.00 0.00 2659.00 0.00 166.13 0.00 127.96 3.78 1.42 1.42 0.00 0.38 100.00
sdf 45060.00 0.00 3004.00 0.00 187.75 0.00 128.00 3.77 1.25 1.25 0.00 0.33 100.00
sdf 44220.00 0.00 2948.00 0.00 184.25 0.00 128.00 3.75 1.27 1.27 0.00 0.34 100.00
sdf 42930.00 0.00 2862.00 0.00 178.88 0.00 128.00 3.77 1.29 1.29 0.00 0.35 100.00
sdf 43260.00 0.00 2885.00 0.00 180.37 0.00 128.04 3.76 1.33 1.33 0.00 0.35 100.00
sdf 39390.00 0.00 2626.00 0.00 164.12 0.00 128.00 3.80 1.45 1.45 0.00 0.38 100.00
sdf 43890.00 0.00 2925.00 0.00 182.76 0.00 127.96 3.80 1.30 1.30 0.00 0.34 100.00
sdf 44430.00 0.00 2962.00 0.00 185.12 0.00 128.00 3.78 1.28 1.28 0.00 0.34 100.00
sdf 44460.00 0.00 2964.00 0.00 185.25 0.00 128.00 3.76 1.27 1.27 0.00 0.34 100.00
sdf 45060.00 0.00 3005.00 0.00 187.87 0.00 128.04 3.83 1.27 1.27 0.00 0.33 100.00
sdf 36660.00 0.00 2443.00 0.00 152.63 0.00 127.95 3.81 1.56 1.56 0.00 0.41 100.00
sdf 42030.00 0.00 2802.00 0.00 175.12 0.00 128.00 3.80 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.36 100.00
sdf 44940.00 0.00 2996.00 0.00 187.25 0.00 128.00 3.79 1.26 1.26 0.00 0.33 100.00
sdf 44460.00 0.00 2964.00 0.00 185.25 0.00 128.00 3.76 1.27 1.27 0.00 0.34 100.00
Code:
$ hdparm -I /dev/sdf
/dev/sdf:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: TOSHIBA DT01ACA200
Serial Number: 3480B64TS
Firmware Revision: MX4OABB0
Transport: Serial, ATA8-AST, SATA 1.0a, SATA II Extensions, SATA Rev 2.5, SATA Rev 2.6, SATA Rev 3.0; Revision: ATA8-AST T13 Project D1697 Revision 0b
Standards:
Used: unknown (minor revision code 0x0029)
Supported: 8 7 6 5
Likely used: 8
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 268435455
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 3907029168
Logical Sector size: 512 bytes
Physical Sector size: 4096 bytes
Logical Sector-0 offset: 0 bytes
device size with M = 1024*1024: 1907729 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 2000398 MBytes (2000 GB)
cache/buffer size = unknown
Form Factor: 3.5 inch
Nominal Media Rotation Rate: 7200
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
Queue depth: 32
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 0
Advanced power management level: disabled
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120nsWhen performing the write test, what method are you using to generate the IO on the drive? Are you writing O_SYNC & direct or running the IO long enough to not gain benefit from page cache?
Chewy509
Wotty wot wot.
During write, it's our own forensic acquisition software generating the load (so is dependent on the source device and contents as well), but when the source is an SSD, the SSDs read performance easily outstrips the write performance of the Toshiba... All our software uses O_DIRECT for cache bypass hinting for both read and write, not that it really matters when you're transferring TB's at a time...
But here is the iostat output when # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdf bs=1M
Code:
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rMB/s wMB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdf 0.00 18589.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 58.59 240.00 42.24 71.34 0.00 71.34 0.59 29.60
sdf 0.00 45472.00 0.00 1566.00 0.00 183.52 240.00 142.25 91.07 0.00 91.07 0.64 100.00
sdf 0.00 38048.00 0.00 1309.00 0.00 153.40 240.00 142.45 108.64 0.00 108.64 0.76 100.00
sdf 0.00 41760.00 0.00 1451.00 0.00 170.04 240.00 143.28 98.17 0.00 98.17 0.69 100.00
sdf 0.00 42688.00 0.00 1468.00 0.00 172.03 240.00 143.79 98.56 0.00 98.56 0.68 100.00
sdf 0.00 46400.00 0.00 1600.00 0.00 187.50 240.00 143.21 89.50 0.00 89.50 0.62 100.00
sdf 0.00 45454.00 0.00 1563.00 0.00 183.09 239.91 143.08 91.00 0.00 91.00 0.64 100.00
sdf 0.00 45472.00 0.00 1580.00 0.00 185.16 240.00 143.04 91.14 0.00 91.14 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 39904.00 0.00 1368.00 0.00 160.31 240.00 143.24 105.22 0.00 105.22 0.73 100.00
sdf 0.00 44544.00 0.00 1538.00 0.00 180.23 240.00 144.10 92.64 0.00 92.64 0.65 100.00
sdf 0.00 40832.00 0.00 1399.00 0.00 163.95 240.00 143.22 102.31 0.00 102.31 0.71 100.00
sdf 0.00 46400.00 0.00 1593.00 0.00 186.68 240.00 141.53 89.56 0.00 89.56 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 45472.00 0.00 1587.00 0.00 185.98 240.00 143.72 90.38 0.00 90.38 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 45472.00 0.00 1570.00 0.00 183.98 240.00 143.28 91.30 0.00 91.30 0.64 100.00
sdf 0.00 42688.00 0.00 1469.00 0.00 172.15 240.00 143.27 92.02 0.00 92.02 0.68 100.00
sdf 0.00 37120.00 0.00 1284.00 0.00 150.47 240.00 144.19 117.93 0.00 117.93 0.78 100.00
sdf 0.00 44544.00 0.00 1514.00 0.00 177.42 240.00 142.30 94.59 0.00 94.59 0.66 100.00
sdf 0.00 46400.00 0.00 1596.00 0.00 187.03 240.00 144.32 90.48 0.00 90.48 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 45472.00 0.00 1581.00 0.00 185.27 240.00 143.22 90.51 0.00 90.51 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 45472.00 0.00 1583.00 0.00 185.51 240.00 142.16 89.98 0.00 89.98 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 42688.00 0.00 1456.00 0.00 170.74 240.16 142.45 97.01 0.00 97.01 0.69 100.00
sdf 0.00 36192.00 0.00 1261.00 0.00 147.66 239.81 142.90 114.05 0.00 114.05 0.79 100.00
sdf 0.00 46400.00 0.00 1602.00 0.00 187.73 240.00 144.27 90.17 0.00 90.17 0.62 100.00
sdf 0.00 45472.00 0.00 1557.00 0.00 182.46 240.00 143.32 91.92 0.00 91.92 0.64 100.00
sdf 0.00 46400.00 0.00 1589.00 0.00 186.21 240.00 142.04 89.54 0.00 89.54 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 44544.00 0.00 1532.00 0.00 179.53 240.00 144.33 93.62 0.00 93.62 0.65 100.00
sdf 0.00 39904.00 0.00 1400.00 0.00 164.06 240.00 143.22 102.26 0.00 102.26 0.71 100.00
sdf 0.00 37120.00 0.00 1279.00 0.00 149.88 240.00 142.05 111.67 0.00 111.67 0.78 100.00
sdf 0.00 46400.00 0.00 1582.00 0.00 185.39 240.00 144.02 91.00 0.00 91.00 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 45472.00 0.00 1578.00 0.00 184.92 240.00 142.76 90.64 0.00 90.64 0.63 100.00
sdf 0.00 44544.00 0.00 1549.00 0.00 181.52 240.00 142.04 91.77 0.00 91.77 0.65 100.00
sdf 0.00 41760.00 0.00 1429.00 0.00 167.46 240.00 142.84 99.15 0.00 99.15 0.70 100.00
sdf 0.00 43616.00 0.00 1490.00 0.00 174.61 240.00 142.26 96.29 0.00 96.29 0.67 100.00
sdf 0.00 38976.00 0.00 1340.00 0.00 157.03 240.00 142.74 106.84 0.00 106.84 0.75 100.00I may be the only one, but the Toshiba drives are so cheap and have such low reviews that I've always avoided them.
Have the 3.5" drives developed any interesting technology improvements since being split off from Hitachi?
Have the 3.5" drives developed any interesting technology improvements since being split off from Hitachi?
Santilli
Hairy Aussie
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2002
- Messages
- 5,278
ost Helpful Customer Reviews
57 of 59 people found the following review helpful
Solid... Fast... Grande storage...
By Richard Brookes on July 31, 2013
Size: 3 TB Verified Purchase
After a lot of review reading and research into larger capacity hard drives, I settled on this Toshiba because of the size to price ratio,low power consumption, and the 7200rpm spindle speed.
There seems to be a huge reliability problem with large 1TB plus drives on the market, I had a very hard time finding consistent good reviews on ANY manufacturer. I was seriously considering a Western Digital "Green" drive, to use in my Home Theater PC, but this was going to serve as my main operating system drive as well as storage, the slowish speeds concerned me. I found this Toshiba (yes it is a re-branded Hitachi) on sale, and most of the reviews seemed favorable, so I bought it.
I've had it for about 4 months, and it is getting close to full already, let me say this; the drive is fast, seemingly reliable, and I'm very happy with it. I got the retail box for the manufacturer's warranty, to be safe, but seems like a terrific drive. My system boots fast, has no problem reading and playing high def video, and it is QUIET, and according to the specs (I have no real way to test this) power friendly, which is what I need for a Home Theater machine.
Highly recommended product.
Thank you for reading my review.
57 of 59 people found the following review helpful
Solid... Fast... Grande storage...
By Richard Brookes on July 31, 2013
Size: 3 TB Verified Purchase
After a lot of review reading and research into larger capacity hard drives, I settled on this Toshiba because of the size to price ratio,low power consumption, and the 7200rpm spindle speed.
There seems to be a huge reliability problem with large 1TB plus drives on the market, I had a very hard time finding consistent good reviews on ANY manufacturer. I was seriously considering a Western Digital "Green" drive, to use in my Home Theater PC, but this was going to serve as my main operating system drive as well as storage, the slowish speeds concerned me. I found this Toshiba (yes it is a re-branded Hitachi) on sale, and most of the reviews seemed favorable, so I bought it.
I've had it for about 4 months, and it is getting close to full already, let me say this; the drive is fast, seemingly reliable, and I'm very happy with it. I got the retail box for the manufacturer's warranty, to be safe, but seems like a terrific drive. My system boots fast, has no problem reading and playing high def video, and it is QUIET, and according to the specs (I have no real way to test this) power friendly, which is what I need for a Home Theater machine.
Highly recommended product.
Thank you for reading my review.