WD is at it again

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
Does anyone wonder if 4-bits per cell WD flash will store data as reliably as their esteemed HDDs? :rofl:

This latest achievement follows a nearly three-decade long legacy of industry firsts in flash innovation, including the industry’s multi-level cell (MLC) flash technologies using two bits (X2) and three bits (X3) per cell.
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
Western Digital isn't any more special than most of the other SSD manufacturers. They don't make the controller or the flash. The BiCs3 flash is made by Toshiba.
 

Chewy509

Wotty wot wot.
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
3,357
Location
Gold Coast Hinterland, Australia
Well, they do have their (cough, cough) reputation to uphold, so it might be fair to assume these will make as good paperweights as their HDDs.

FWIW, we've had a stack of WD Red's at work that have been quite good in our storage servers... But the Blue's and Black's, yep, no so great failure rates. (we only had 4x Green's, never again).

As for the NAND, interested to know what the write-capacity of those cells are... With each feature size drop and the increase in bits stored per cell has seen a drop in the number of writes per cell... But who cares if you can only write to your 8TB SSD 1000x (or even less) times over? You've got a 8TB SSD! (note: sarcasm mode is on).
 

jtr1962

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 25, 2002
Messages
4,374
Location
Flushing, New York
As for the NAND, interested to know what the write-capacity of those cells are... With each feature size drop and the increase in bits stored per cell has seen a drop in the number of writes per cell... But who cares if you can only write to your 8TB SSD 1000x (or even less) times over? You've got a 8TB SSD! (note: sarcasm mode is on).
Honestly, four bits per cell scares me. Three bits was bad enough in that you had to distinguish between 8 voltage levels. Now we'll have 16. I'm more concerned with how long the cells will hold data than with the number of writes. With wear leveling it's pretty much impossible for most people to wear out a large drive, even if the maximum writes per cell is only 100. On the other hand, if the drive sits on a shelf will the data disappear in a matter of months, even weeks? Really, I expect unpowered drives to hold their data for at least two or three decades. The rationale here is if you didn't look at the data in that long, it's probably worthless to you but you might want to retrieve data which has been sitting for a few years, or even a decade.

With each increase in bits per cell the incremental drive capacity increase is less but the chances of losing data probably increase exponentially.
 
Top