Most SSDs use 64-layer NAND and the newer ones use 96 layers. I think you meant 3 levels, i.e., TLC.
I'm sure there will be a trend toward 4TB M.2 now that I have the U.2 drive. I don't think any M.2 can keep up with the sustained writes as well as the U.2 SSDs though. I'm hoping to use...
That's way beyond my pay grade. Many years ago I was peripherally involved in a project with an artificial tongue. I think it had 6-8 dimensions, though I don't know if that included the "texture."
I prefer the smallest practical 3-piece cases that have a soft internal layer and hard externals, except the corner "bumpers" are an extension of the soft materials. Typically I buy about 2-3 to find the best one and keep the others in reserve. After a few years it can be difficult to find a...
It needs storage drivers. I used to have a whole folder of them back in the day. Sometimes one would work with one or more products or not. In any case they were a PITa.
I just want it to fit in the normal 3.5" drive carrier in my case where there is an intake fan. All the 2.5" drive adapters seem to be for SATA and/or the 9.5 mm high drives. How did people mount the 2.5" 10K drives in a 3.5" space, or were they only in special racks?
It's only an issue with 7 from what I understand.
The only remaining issue is the disk activity light is always on now. Perhaps that is the result of the M.2 to U.2 adaptation. The drive runs rather warm, 38 at idle and 49 under benchmarking.
I'm using the M.2 port with a U.2 adapter and cable. At first I cloned the partitions from the old M.2 to an 830, resized, installed NVMe and then cloned to the U.2. Then the stupid Windows claimed I was not genuine. :mad: It's just a pain since there is only one M.2 and no U.2 on the old...
I'm sure it will boot, but I'm jumping through some hoops to resize and restore the image.
Meanwhile, why doesn't the SMART data show? Do I need a special program?
It is the U.2 2.5" x 15 mm Intel 4510 something or other. I copied a couple of TB from the NADs and it definitely generates some warmth.
According to the specs it is designed for the CLOUDS, but I should be able to boot a large NVMe drive from the x99 board, right?
I don't know if results ARE normal or not. 8GB length usually is enough to counter any nonsense.
I cannot return it anyway as the box was sitting around for some time due to the flooding, etc.
I just returned late Saturday and now there is more travel next week. I will figure on booting...
My hardware is rather old, being build in early 2015 from Haswell E hexacore parts. The storage and video is of course more recent.
I'm still waiting for newer CPUs.
No, it is 4TB. The boot drive was originally 256GB M.2 PCIe, but then replaced with a 512GB PCIe SSD that also was not NVMe. Somehow I had forgotten that. It's hard to believe that this PC is about 4.4 years old already and that last SSD is dated March 2015. It is experiencing a slow...
I finally installed the 4GB NVMe, but it doesn't boot and the Macrium doesn't see it. :mad: Aperitif the abnormal SSD was PCIe only and able to work on Win 7 naturally.
I can wait until Q3 to see if the Zen 2 is any good compared to the Lake options. I read that Windows 7 ends on January 14, 2020, so there is still some time.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.