Search results

Yeah, it is this redirect that is confusing, cause going direct to Duroflex without Google does NOT redirect. Initially I thought Duroflex changed hosting providers, their old IP address was assigned to Shoppingfordress, and the change had not propagated to all the DNS servers. But the strange...

Thanks Merc, will try to pass it on to them.

Since it's difficult to completely erase flash memory, isn't there a risk of the buyer being able to undelete? Factory reset options are known to not work properly.

Thanks Merc. But how is it that typing the address in the browser address bar does not re-direct?

Acutal Site I want to go to: duroflex. Google it. Search results correctly come up with duroflexworld.com/ Clicking the search link goes to duroflexworld.com, but within 2 seconds you will end up with http://www.shoppingfordress.com/ If you type duroflexworld.com in the browser address bar...

Same behaviour in Firefox. I never use IE. Other than this one issue, nothing odd in system behavior (I never find anything on Malware scans I do periodically). Since adwcleaner could not find anything wrong with Chrome on the second try, do you still think I should nuke Chrome?

ADW found a few things; log file attached. Don't know if these were there prior to my issue with the web site. Rebooted and ran it again; no problems found. Followed by Malwarebytes; no issues found. Thanks Merc, and all.

Thanks guys. :( But usually Goofgle will say "Malware Detected!" when oe wants to go through Google to a bad site. Got nothing of the kind. Like I said, the site actually loaded, then withing 2 secs went to another site. FWIW, the site I wanted to go to was a local mattress manufacturer, the...

Can someone tell me why: 1) I can access a website if I type the URL (not IP address) in the browser address window 2) But if I search for that business's name and Google shows me the same exact URL in the search results, and I click that search result link, I go to the correct web site but...

Cryptic as usual!

Thanks Chewy. The action is set to Save, not View. For Save, there is no choice of programs (obviously). But I guess this is for PDFs on the web, not for saving a web page as a PDF. Not worth wasting time on this, I'll just continue to use Chrome.

I think you know that in California, it is illegal not to provide heating, but not mandatory to provide cooling. Decades ago, when I lived in Fullerton in a rented apartment, such was the case; heating (only in the single bedroom) and no cooling. That sucks, Merc :(

SD, I've been doing this for years! My question was aimed at Merc who said the built-in PDF renderer in FF sucked. I was asking how I can force FF to use Acrobat or Foxit as its rendering engine. I checked the settings, but couldn;t find anything meaningful. Adobe PDF is my default printer (for...

Yeah. A cat that used to visit us fell down from the 5th floor outside and died in my arms. It was sickening, I'll spare the gory details. Was a very, very painful experience for us.

I have both Foxit and Acrobat Pro (an older version). How do I tell Firefox to use one of these to create PDFs from web pages? I don't see anything in Settings that'll let me do this.

I do all my payments online. I "print" the payments screen to a PDF for my records. Chrome is near perfect in this, producing a clean, well-laid out PDF. Firefox sucks. Many financial institutions didn't support anything other than IE and FF before. Now it seems they support Chrome better than...

Can you share that map? In 20 - 30 years, it will need updating, with this global warming shit.

There are people I know that drink coffee this many times. But the cups are like 30-40 ml cups; like a small peg. So the total quantity in a day ain't much.

You may have a point there, Tea.

The joker is building mainframes all over again. Vintage era ones. I last worked with them in 1982. No thanks.

Puddy tat unintentionally goes on a plane ride.

Tannin: 1) Your choices must be really good. That is why you chose them almost automatically after 13 years. I will try to listen to them someday. 2) I would say you are more consistent than stubborn. These choices must have been burned-in in your brain!

Deja Vu all over again, eh?! This seems to be a pet idea of yours?

My 320 GB (odd-size?) Samsung drives have worked flawlessly. But I hear you.

This was the first one I owned. The first PC I used was at work, a Radio Shack Trash-80 with two 8" floppy drives running CP/M.

386/25 with Dos 5.0, 1 MB RAM, I think 10 MB HDD, VGA color monitor.

fb, you're addicted man, seriously! If you don't address this now, your intake will keep on increasing till you will get medical advice to cut it out.

jtr, AT&T made promises to get some concessions, then hasn't kept the promises. That is the real problem. I don't think they were naive enough to not know what they were getting into when they made the promises.

But Toshiba drives don't seem to fare well. In those drive surveys, or user reviews on various web sites. That is surprising o me; unless Toshiba mucked with the HGST's design / materials / process.

Too much coffee too often can also lead to Costochondritis. Feels like a heart attack, but ain't.

There'd be other ramifications in the tape vs drive debate: handling requirements, space requirements, environment requirements, etc. Looks like for Tea's purposes, disk drives match her needs better.

More AT&T shenanigans

For a fresh install of W-10, will a Win-7 Technet key work? Sigh. So many questions. I guess better to wait and see how the bleeding-edge people fare.

I have two APC Back-UPS RS 1500 units, both purchased in 2006. One had batteries replaced about 4 years ago. Both perform quite well. One gets a UPS for reliability; not point scrimping on a critical item.

What's not clear (to me) is, if you upgrade within the "free" window, do you never ever have to pay for it? Or is it free to use for one year then shuts down or nags you to pay?

SD, 1) Win-7 needs to be at SP1 level, and Win 8 at 8.1. 2) The hw must be capable of running Win-10 3) You need to have a certain KB installed; one of the CNet articles I linked to has the info. If you have auto updates on, you should have it. I'm sure you meet all the requirements, so...

More here: http://www.cnet.com/news/how-to-reserve-your-free-copy-of-windows-10/ http://www.cnet.com/news/microsoft-prices-single-windows-10-licenses-at-119-for-home-199-for-pro/ http://www.cnet.com/news/microsoft-windows-10-finally-has-a-release-date-july-29/

I wasn't home Sunday & Monday. Monday night I turn on the PC and a new icon is in the tray. It's the one before the flag. Clicking on it opens a window that talks about Win 10 and says to reserve my copy of it and if I do, it will be download (3GB) when released. There's about 6 screens...

That's scary. Especially with John-Common-Doe thinking Macs are invulnerable.

Spot / local heat may be the issue. Since you can't cool the room, perhaps sticking a pedestal fan to blow in or suck out air might help somewhat. Sometimes my 9 year-old APC BackUPS 1500 will switch back and forth between mains and battery non-stop. Happened this mornbing too. I stuck the only...

Merc & SD, thanks for the tips on Teracopy & Fastcopy. I tried them and will pass. IMHO, they are not robust and barf on large copy jobs. FYI, my CPU (inconsequential, but nevertheless) is an i5-3570k @ 3.40 GHz. I have 16GB of physical RAM. All drives (even the old ones) had enough free space...

Wrapping Up! Thanks all, and time. But why did the drive manufacturer's utility, DFT, say the drive was good? That too after running for 63 hours on a 1GB drive that was on an Intel SATA 6 Gbps channel. This is what puzzles me and makes me lose confidence in it. Not only SMART, but even the...

Thanks DD; I'll probably do that. Windows popped up a message that a HDD was bad. So I guess the drive is toast. Puzzled though why DFT says it's good.

DFT Completed. I need some help folks. For the new 3TB drives, should I run a) DFT or b) just check SMART values + do a long (not quick) format in Windows? I ask because for the bad drive, DFT now says it is fine, and SMART by Crystal DiskInfo went from caution before the DFT to Bad after...

60 hours exceeded and still not done. There's still a quarter progress bar's worth of white space at the rightmost end, and it's been in that state for the last 5 hours with the drive access light on the case on solid for the last 60 hours. Is it even doing anything? The UI certainly sucks...

Thanks Buck, that makes sense. Meanwhile it's still chugging away on the 1GB - 25 hours and counting, 16 blocks done, guess another 8 to go on the progress bar. I would think if it maxed out on problems it would stop, but it's still going. Now I'm curious as to the end result.

What happens if your Windows drive becomes toast and your backup image fails?

Thanks Buck, good to know these details. The drive is out of active service now, and I'm running DFT more out of curiosity. If it is serviceable, it might become one of the 3-5 backup drives I use, or a scratch drive. I guess it would be prudent to run DFT on the new 3 TB HGST drives before...

Well, the DFT UI isn't very helpful. I first tried running Scan, but apparently that only checks Smart something that runs for hours. I finally figured out that clicking Utils / Surface Long Test is the option I was wanting. After running 2+ hours, progress bar is at 2 blocks on a 1GB drive. No...

27 updates installed for me without a glitch / hitch. Don't know what was in them; I walked away.