CNN: AMD + ATI = Pure goodness

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
Nothing seems to be good for the consumer any more...
 

Tannin

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 15, 2002
Messages
4,448
Location
Huon Valley, Tasmania
Website
www.redhill.net.au
Sounds like a nightmare to me. HTF am I supposed to believe that the current standout best combination for performance and reliability (AMD CPU & Nvidia graphics) won't get crippled "by accident".

Serious conflict of interest there, AMD, please don't do it!
 

P5-133XL

Xmas '97
Joined
Jan 15, 2002
Messages
3,173
Location
Salem, Or
I see this as a good thing. I believe it will give ATI access to smaller geometry production facilities faster than the current method of subcontracting the graphics chipset. If AMD does it right, on-board graphics technology will leap-frog Nvidia and Intel. Further direct access to smaller geometry production facilities for High performance ATI products should be producing higher speeds at lower power than Nvidia. This is a win-win scenario.

Now that is the optimists viewpoint. The possibility that AMD/ATI will screw it up royally is definately out there.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,275
Location
I am omnipresent
Apparently Intel is ending its use of ATI-integrated GPUs in its higher-end integrated motherboards but will continue to support Crossfire. Did anyone not see that coming?
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
I guess Intel is going to have to go back to making their own chipsets.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,729
Location
Horsens, Denmark
sechs said:
I guess Intel is going to have to go back to making their own chipsets.

Not a bad thing, IMHO. IIRC, they were never the performance leader, but set reliability standards that others strived for.
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
ddrueding said:
Not a bad thing, IMHO. IIRC, they were never the performance leader, but set reliability standards that others strived for.

As of late, I don't think that they were the reasonable-shipping-time leader either. This is why they were using ATi chipsets.
 
Top