ddrueding
Fixture
Yeah, I've had mixed results. Particularly when trying to run high-end RAID cards on low-end desktop boards. It sometimes assumed I had an external video and disabled the on-board. That was the last time I used an ASUS board
Coriolis effect? :scratch:It wouldn't be the only case of regional reliability variation. Samsung, for instance, seems to be a lot more reliable in the Soutern Hemisphere than it is around here. As WD is if you compare my experience with them and yours.
?Take your antipsychotics, doofus.
My personal belief is that any who says they've had a positive experience with Western Digital products as storage media is either lying or needs to up their chlorpromazine dosage.
So you're going to be buying Seagate from now on?Sub-par construction material.
It wouldn't be the only case of regional reliability variation. Samsung, for instance, seems to be a lot more reliable in the Soutern Hemisphere than it is around here. As WD is if you compare my experience with them and yours.
That might be ok if I was the only one to have a positive experience with WD, but Buck isn't a sociopath and he often mentioned that he uses WD in his computers.Only a sociopath would suggest that WD is acceptable for anything other than construction material.
Buck isn't a sociopath and he often mentioned that he uses WD in his computers.
Is 100% good or bad? If 100% is good, those numbers for Intel motherboards look awfully fishy.
The reliability rating is based on the actual returns of faulty products we have experienced ourselves. On a global scale the results could be quite different as this rating is based on and limited to our own sales. The rating does not relate to an individual item, but to all items by the same manufacturer in the same category. A rating of 2.5 stars represents the normal rate of return we would expect from all our sales across all categories. Products that are very unlikely to develop faults will tend to have high ratings (eg network cables), while more complicated or fragile products (eg notebooks, hard drives) will tend to have lower reliability ratings. It is the rating relative to other manufacturers in the category that is important. A rating of 4 stars would be excellent for a hard drive, but not so good for a cable.
Only a sociopath would suggest that WD is acceptable for anything other than construction material.
I prefer the "born wrong" theory.
So how does your theory explain the Seagate drives with a 31% National market share equated to 56% of all drives delivered for Data reclamation, this is more than twice the rate of the WD drives with a similar 30% market share?
My theory holds that Seagate drives are also born wrong. Which is why I've suddenly become very interested in MRAOPCR technology.
What is that? Google only brings up SF for MRAOPCR.