Intel/McAfee

Chewy509

Wotty wot wot.
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
3,359
Location
Gold Coast Hinterland, Australia
I've quickly read through a few press-releases, but none say why?

What is Intel after in acquiring McAfee? Most people here would agree it's not for their virus solutions?

For the Oracle buying Sun one, that was easy - Get control of Java (which is very important to Oracle's business solutions), and gain access to new customers via controlling the Solaris OS. Having hardware brought in (in the form of SPARC servers), also allows Oracle to become a one-stop-shop for all your high-end business ERP needs.

But Intel getting McAfee? What were they after?
 

timwhit

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 23, 2002
Messages
5,278
Location
Chicago, IL
This is baffling to me, does McAfee make any software that doesn't suck? They should have bought Sun last year for about the same amount.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,748
Location
Horsens, Denmark
The best idea was in a Slashdot post. Provide an update that completely uninstalls the product, offering a 300% CPU performance gain immediately.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,303
Location
I am omnipresent
The best theory I heard was that Intel wants entry into the mobile/embedded security marketplace. I can't imagine why.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,497
Location
USA
Michael: Everyone does everything just to get laid.
Karen: Who said that? Freud?
Michael: No, I did.
 

timwhit

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 23, 2002
Messages
5,278
Location
Chicago, IL
The best theory I heard was that Intel wants entry into the mobile/embedded security marketplace. I can't imagine why.

After reading about this a bit more my thought is that Intel is after the cloud based security services that McAfee has developed. Maybe Intel is considering getting into cloud stuff again.

On another note, when did the term cloud computing replace the term software as a service? It certainly is more ambiguous, I guess.
 

Chewy509

Wotty wot wot.
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
3,359
Location
Gold Coast Hinterland, Australia
On another note, when did the term cloud computing replace the term software as a service? It certainly is more ambiguous, I guess.

I would have to assume 'marketing' is the answer to that one. At Uni, 2 of my subjects are doing a lot of teaching on 'cloud computing' and as far as I can tell a lot of people don't get it...

We had a guest lecturer come in and describe their business and how they used the cloud. (90% of their infrastructue is cloud based - amazon for datawarehousing and processing, etc).

I asked the two 'stupid' questions. "What about differences in laws between where the data is uploaded from, housed and processed"? and "what are ramifications for data loss on your part if a third party is holding your clients data screws up"?

The 1st question wasn't answered in ay detail, and the 2nd one was answered with "we have contracts in place". And people base their entire business and reputation on a contract with a third party?

The cloud is IMHO just another form of out-sourcing, and am waiting for one of the providers (google, amazon or one of the lesser known companies) for f*(&*k royally to see what the result is... Think about, some companies are using a cloud based system to hold *all* of their data, including customer records, etc. What happens if a service provider is bought out, and they decide to onsell all the data they have to a 3rd party. Any contract across international borders with a corporate takeover is the mix is going to mean jack sh*t.
 

Chewy509

Wotty wot wot.
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
3,359
Location
Gold Coast Hinterland, Australia
Don't they know strong winds will blow the clouds away? :)

If you're refering to the 'cycle' then I'll just wait for the sunshine...

PS. Centralised (mainframe) -> decetralised (client/server) -> centralised (terminal services/Citrix/SunRay) -> decentralised (client/server) -> centralised (cloud) -> ...
 

sechs

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
4,709
Location
Left Coast
The best theory I heard was that Intel wants entry into the mobile/embedded security marketplace. I can't imagine why.
Intel has no mobile strategy. Maybe its now, "we make secure chips?"

As I understand it, the two companies were working together on implementing McAfee's security in hardware (for obvious reasons). If this turns out to be big, Intel would now own it lock, stock, and barrel.

Or, this could be the next Xircom.
 
Top