Mirrorless Cameras (MILC) and Lenses

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,451
Location
USA
OTOH the 24/1.4 has highly distortion and needs to be severely corrected for rectilinear viewing.

Is whatever Sigma 70-200/2.8 all that fragile or sensitive to heat/humidity?
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
22,228
Location
I am omnipresent
As with all things Sigma, it's bulky AF. It's forgivable for an everyday walking around 24-70/2.8 but the long lens is an extra-special complication.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,451
Location
USA
AF was never the strong suit of Sigma. :LOL:
Have you ever used the 150 or 180 HSM macros, the last ones before OS?
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
17,451
Location
USA
The Sigma tele macros had super slow AF on natively EF DSLRs. They are actually a little better on MILS.
I don't know the AF issues with the Sigma 70-200/2.8, but the Canon RF 70-200/2.8 Z would be better in almost every way.
 
Top