I think this
v also bad news for Nividia...as notebook sales comprise the majority of computer purchases:
U guys probably missed this thread
Apple going 'rogue' >AMD?
Nvidia, Intel vie for lead role at Apple
Apple's updated laptop line, does focus on Nividia over sheer CPU, but that's bcuz they wanted longer battery life than the typical PC.
^I disagree with the analysts analysis on the Mac line being so GPU orientated, as mostly Steve-O has been reading SF and more specifically Merc's comments about fried testicles in early MBP's, along with Steve-O's known hate for loud fan speeds; and so he went for less powerful, less heat dissipating GPU, less TDP.
The current top MBP's use only a mid-level performance ~<25w GPU's. Funny thing is that ATI has some higher performing mid-range GPU's that Apple could use that consume just about the same amount of battery power as Nvidia...could be contractual reasons 4 that. If you want higher end GPU performance, you're SOL with Apple's laptops, gotta get a testicle burner, Alienware or such gaming laptop.
Seems to me if the ATI HD5650, which is X11 compatible, 6 monitor capable, lol + on new 40nm process = low current consumption; was available for site testing last Dec., Apple could have had time to put it into the latest refresh? Then again, Nvid did work w/Apple for custom auto switching btw discrete and integrated GPU's for longer battery life...maybe ATI did not have such an easy solution?
http://www.dvhardware.net/article39903.html
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Computer-Games-on-Laptop-Graphic-Cards.13849.0.html
Nvidia's future may hinge on the outcome of the lawsuits btw Intel & them.