time
Storage? I am Storage!
Fushigi, that's an amazing interpretation of copyright, and one that will win you no favours with webmasters.
Any security personal will say that obscurity is often worse than useless. And copyright is not the issue; there's nothing about serving the content to authorized users (be they public or subscribers/members) that changes based on whether or not the content is delivered in the context of the site's design.time said:Fushigi, that's an amazing interpretation of copyright, and one that will win you no favours with webmasters.
Mercutio said:Here's a simple quiz.
I pay $7 a month for a subscription to cyber.playboy.com so I can...
A) Look at the pictures they post every day
b) Download and store the pictures that I've paid to look at.
time said:I don't know why, in this day and age, you would need something like Noscript - unless, of course, your browser has a history of security problems. Oh wait, Firefox had more security problems in the past year than all other browsers combined - bummer.
sechs said:http://fasterfox.mozdev.org/
Version 1.2 of Firefox. Really?e_dawg said:Tried Firefox 1.2 and liked it...
Here's one that's not hidden. Not patched, either, and an exploit already exists.LiamC said:Are you sure about that? Microsoft, by "bundling their security fixes into monthly roll-ups for user convenience", is also able to hide the number of vulnerabilities that have been exposed. 1 security patch != 1 "hole".
CougTek said:Version 1.2 of Firefox. Really?e_dawg said:Tried Firefox 1.2 and liked it...
Mercutio said:I've tried it in the past. For some sites, it is very helpful.
For others, particularly those that depend on a database (SF, for instance), it seems to make page access slower.
CougTek said:Where is the grammar police?
What? You don't see it? Than maybe it's time for you to retire.The Grammar Police said:CougTek said:Where is the grammar police?
Did I miss something?
Groltz said:V1.5 sure does take its sweet damned time in loading the gmail page compared to IE6. I wasn't expecting that.
:sqnt:
CougTek said:What? You don't see it? Than maybe it's time for you to retire. Clearer?
!!!The Grammar Police said:Is there a then/than typo somewhere that these tired and jaded old eyes missed?
The Grammar Police said:-10: LiamC mixes up his singulars and plurals when speaking of Microsoft. Note that it is acceptable to use either the singular or the plural when speaking of a company (as it is a single organisation but a collection of individuals), but not to do both in the same passage. Still NAHO. I'll let him off with a warning.
Groltz said:Right now v1.5 is using 73M of memory with only 1window/1tab open after 30 minutes use.
That seems a little heavy, don't you think?