Other than seagate's hybrid hard drives what innovation is left in spinning disks?
We are all just waiting for the day our RAM is non-volatile anyway.
Other than seagate's hybrid hard drives what innovation is left in spinning disks?
We are all just waiting for the day our RAM is non-volatile anyway.
I'd rather have a Seagate drive than a Toshiba. Or a Hitachi. And obviously a Samsung. I'd take a Toshiba before a WD, but who wouldn't?
This sucks.
Strange, is that through Seagate direct? I only say that, as the only time I've been charged for anything (other than shipping) is for advance replacements.The catch, Seagates warranty agent in Aus want ~$37 bucks to process end user claims. Plus postage. Add shipping and so for about $57 I cam get a replacement 200GB drive.
Other than seagate's hybrid hard drives what innovation is left in spinning disks?
We are all just waiting for the day our RAM is non-volatile anyway.
You make me nervous! I have a Hibachi 1TB drive as my boot drive; can't recollect the model # (at work now).Hitachi's 7k1000 aren't terribly reliable either. I sure do love me some HD103UJs, though.
Because if they don't spinning HD's will go the way of the dodo even faster at the hand of SSDs.With less drive manufacturers pushing in those areas, why would seagate or WD continue?
That seems rather unlikely. They would just buy up the IP / know how from one of the former players who would be happy to unload it and get something for it....but if someone were to walk into an abandoned HDD space, it would be some bare-bones company with no QA knowledge at all. Welcome back to 100GB drives with 14ms access times and a super low MTBF.
That seems rather unlikely. They would just buy up the IP / know how from one of the former players who would be happy to unload it and get something for it.
Bring back Quantum.
Hitachi's 7k1000 aren't terribly reliable either.
Because if they don't spinning HD's will go the way of the dodo even faster at the hand of SSDs.
Where's your evidence? SSD pricing is much the same as it was nearly a year ago. Larger capacity needs higher density flash, and the smaller the process, the shorter the life and the poorer the performance and reliability.
I think this whole debacle is driven by half-assed analysts who don't understand these issues at all, but believe the fanbois who loudly proclaim that mechanical drives are already obsolete.
If Seagate and WD fail, then I'm sure that somebody else will start up HDs again.
Tape drives, Merc. Yuk.
Would you like one?