Howell
Storage? I am Storage!
I don't think so, one is effective but "stolen"; the other is a lie and not effective.
But both are not genuine and should be avoided.I don't think so, one is effective but "stolen"; the other is a lie and not effective.
Where/how did you get that impression?Ah I see, I thought you were advocating knockoff panels.
The credits would be even more worthless to me instead of my mother as my earnings this year are going to be close to zero. Also, there are two problems with having a local company give an estimate:I'd get a reputable local company to give you an estimate. They should know the interconnection requirements as well as the details on the tax credits; such as the owner of the house may not be relevant, but rather the owner (purchaser) of the system may be able to claim credits regardless of ownership of the structure. Edit: There might need to be some engineering of the ownership of the system to maximize tax credits/abatements.
That kind of defeats one reason for having solar, namely at least being able to have power for heat or A/C while the sun is shining even if the grid goes out.If it is a grid-tied system, there will be specific requirements for connection set by the utility, most likely including an auto-cutoff if the grid goes down; no you won't have power if the grid goes down without a LOT of extra work and permits. IIRC, my local utility won't allow connection to the grid without an automatic solar cutoff (at least for residential installs).
That's in the cards here, also, but I have no idea of the timeline.Don't know about meters; local utility replaced all spinning disc meters with 'smart' meters a few years ago (so they could fire all the meter readers).
That's the part I'm finding the most daunting. ConEd in NYC is actually encouraging solar, so hopefully things here are less onerous. I'm even willing to have someone do the install if the price is reasonable. Freecleansolar would charge $6,500, but maybe I can get that down considering the install is on a low garage roof.I did all the research to install myself, picked all the parts, priced it out, etc. It wasn't until I looked into the permits required that I caved and hired an installer. Look into that part before you start buying. One of the permits comes from the local power company, and they were famous for requiring a letter on legal letterhead threatening suit before they would let one be approved.
I thought much the same thing until I read your link (I actually saw that a few weeks ago while researching). Back when solar panels were very expensive it made no sense to have them facing north. Now that they're around $1/watt or less, putting them in less than optimal orientations still results in acceptable payback periods.I don't see how the north facing panels will deliver sufficient output to offset the penalty, if you have a significant roof pitch, which is common in snow regions.
Almost exactly N-S facing. The pitch is about 35°, which is nearly perfect for my latitude and higher than the pitch of the house roof.What pitch is your garage roof? Are the exactly north/south facing?
OK, so it's doable. In truth, we rarely lose power but it would be nice having power during a grid outage. When the price of batteries comes down, I might seriously also consider adding about 10 to 20 kW-hrs of storage.For running from your panels during a grid outage I believe you need to use an 'islanding' capable inverter. This incorporates a relay/grid tie interconnect that allows it to disconnect the grid from your panel board when it senses a lack of grid power, before power is delivered to the house from the panels.
A 6 or 7 kW system should probably cover that in your part of the country. Covering your needs is ideal but anyone know about the situation where you generate more power than you use? Does the power company buy that power from you at the going rate they charge you, or can the best you do with solar is to zero out your bill? I've just been wondering because at the $0.25/kW-hr total delivery and supply charges if I can sell excess power at that rate I can make a little side income.I'm having an estimate done tomorrow for installing solar. My roof is almost south facing with minimal to no tree coverage. I'm aiming for 7kWh to 9kWh of solar generation for the house which I hope will cover 100% of my usage.
I think the key here is whether or not the additional cost of the microinverters is recouped over the life of the panels in terms of more usable power generation. Also, with microinverters you can install a smaller system for any given amount of generation capacity. Then there's redundancy. If one panel or inverter goes bad you still have the remaining panels. If a central inverter goes bad you're SOL. If a panel goes bad you'll lose any panels in series with it until that panel is replaced.Have any of you considered single string/central inverters versus micro-inverters when designing your systems? I've read the basic pro/con and was curious what helped make the decision for you.
The amount you'll make doing this is minimal. Say you get a loan for 3% and make 7%. A system of the size you're looking at might be $15K installed but remember the average amount subject to interest over the life of the loan will only be half the borrowed amount. So over 10 years you'll pay 10 * 0.03 * $7,500 = $2,250 in interest. If the $15K you invested really makes 7% then you'll be ahead by $10,500 - $2,250 = $8,250 but that's a big if. My returns in the market have been mostly flat for the last few years. You could even lose big if the market crashes. Just putting the money into the solar system gives you a guaranteed return in the long run. I wouldn't do it with a loan if you have the cash handy.Also, what are your thoughts on an arbitrage loan for buying into solar? I have a certain amount available to pay for the system which I expect should cover the entire cost. Rather than pay for the entire install out of pocket I was considering taking a solar loan assuming I can get a reasonable rate, and rather invest the same money into an S&P500 index fund which historically has a ~7% avg return (including inflation) over a long term (7-10 years) until I've reached my ROI on the panel install. The payments I normally make toward my energy costs would just move to paying the loan during this time.
If I install a PV system (or any system for that matter) that is "Class I customers: 60 kW or less" and I drive the electric meter backwards in a surplus, my local utility company (Eversource in Massachusetts) pays me the same rate back at 100% of retail rate.A 6 or 7 kW system should probably cover that in your part of the country. Covering your needs is ideal but anyone know about the situation where you generate more power than you use? Does the power company buy that power from you at the going rate they charge you, or can the best you do with solar is to zero out your bill? I've just been wondering because at the $0.25/kW-hr total delivery and supply charges if I can sell excess power at that rate I can make a little side income.
The small downside to a power surplus is that Eversource will not pay me directly for the generation, I earn credits toward future power purchase. There are ways in which I can transfer my credits to others in the same region who are Eversource customers and find a way for them to pay me for the power.Class I customers receive 100% of the value of their excess kilowatt-hours, including Eversource charges for basic service, distribution, transmission, and transition.
After having a nice conversation with the contractor, they only use panels with micro-inverters in my area. He said this was part of an initiative from the local fire departments because it was safer for them to deal with AC power being sent from the roof of the house versus DC to a string inverter. This contractor uses Enphase solar panels for their clients and projects and they have a software suite called Enphase Enlighten for managing the data from each panel and inverter.I think the key here is whether or not the additional cost of the microinverters is recouped over the life of the panels in terms of more usable power generation. Also, with microinverters you can install a smaller system for any given amount of generation capacity. Then there's redundancy. If one panel or inverter goes bad you still have the remaining panels. If a central inverter goes bad you're SOL. If a panel goes bad you'll lose any panels in series with it until that panel is replaced.
The amount you'll make doing this is minimal. Say you get a loan for 3% and make 7%. A system of the size you're looking at might be $15K installed but remember the average amount subject to interest over the life of the loan will only be half the borrowed amount. So over 10 years you'll pay 10 * 0.03 * $7,500 = $2,250 in interest. If the $15K you invested really makes 7% then you'll be ahead by $10,500 - $2,250 = $8,250 but that's a big if. My returns in the market have been mostly flat for the last few years. You could even lose big if the market crashes. Just putting the money into the solar system gives you a guaranteed return in the long run. I wouldn't do it with a loan if you have the cash handy.
Question if anyone knows the answer:
This is the last year of the 30% federal solar tax credit. Next year it's going down to 25%. NYS has a credit of 25%. There's also a megawatt block incentive which would be about $1,000 and change for a system of the size I'm anticipating. The problem is the federal and NYS tax credits aren't refundable. They can only be used to offset tax liability. My mother, who would be getting the credits, has no NYS tax liability and very little federal tax liability (i.e. not enough to get the credit over the three years you're allowed). I have no tax liability at all, so buying the system under my name makes even less sense. Can these solar companies use the credits themselves, and just reduce the amount they charge you by whatever the credit is? That's the only way doing this is going to make any sense for me since the only credit of value to me otherwise is the megawatt block incentive.
I'll need to check if ConEd does something similar, although the way I'm sizing my system it probably wouldn't generate a net surplus beyond my annual average usage.If I install a PV system (or any system for that matter) that is "Class I customers: 60 kW or less" and I drive the electric meter backwards in a surplus, my local utility company (Eversource in Massachusetts) pays me the same rate back at 100% of retail rate.
The small downside to a power surplus is that Eversource will not pay me directly for the generation, I earn credits toward future power purchase. There are ways in which I can transfer my credits to others in the same region who are Eversource customers and find a way for them to pay me for the power.
In addition to offset or surplus, there is also a payment system called a SMART metering that Eversource will have to pay me a fixed rate irrespective of the amount I consume; it's based on pure generation of power. I'm still trying to figure out the details but it appears to be capped and I have to apply for it as an incentive. The contractor said it's 80% of current rates so somewhere in the $0.145/kWh that I will get paid directly.
http://masmartsolar.com/
https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/h...am-in-massachusetts-change-solar-payback-time
There is also the federal credit of 30% of the cost of the installed system is given as a tax rebate that you already mentioned.
That makes sense from the perspective you mentioned, plus micro-inverters already have all the other advantages I mentioned.After having a nice conversation with the contractor, they only use panels with micro-inverters in my area. He said this was part of an initiative from the local fire departments because it was safer for them to deal with AC power being sent from the roof of the house versus DC to a string inverter. This contractor uses Enphase solar panels for their clients and projects and they have a software suite called Enphase Enlighten for managing the data from each panel and inverter.
The average balance subject to interest over the life of the loan would be about half the principle. When you're first starting payments, the balance is $15K. When you're almost finished, the balance is close to zero. Your total interest paid figure agrees pretty closely with mine.Why would only half the loan be subject to interest over the life of the loan? I would have expected something like:
$15K loan over 10 years at 3%
Total interest paid: $2,380.93
Using that period is an anomaly. Remember the market crashed in 2008. Usually market gains are in the area of 40% or 50% in the first year of recovery from a crash. The long term average is 7% to 8%. Compounded over 10 years that would mean a total return of close to 100% if we assume 7%. In other words, your $15K would be worth about 30K. However, lots of people I've talked to are telling me the markets have been in a bubble, and have been propped up by federal policy since 2008. It's likely we're going to see negative returns for a very long time once the first big correction happens. I'm getting out of the markets within the next few months, and putting everything in cash or cash equivalents.If I used the S&P500 to estimate from past returns of 2009->2019 (which I realize is no guarantee) and did the same $15K over ten years that would be worth ~$53K or $48K after 15% tax rate.
My only advice would be to make sure the specified inverter is capable of islanding (allowing you to run off the panels if your utility power goes down). This function will disconnect from the grid when its down so there's no risk to line workers from your solar generation. Otherwise you won't be able to use them when you potentially need them the most.
My only advice would be to make sure the specified inverter is capable of islanding (allowing you to run off the panels if your utility power goes down). This function will disconnect from the grid when its down so there's no risk to line workers from your solar generation. Otherwise you won't be able to use them when you potentially need them the most.
I'm guessing that 99% of the people with solar believe they'll be sitting pretty when the next blackout comes. Of course not realizing that during a grid-down situation their solar will shut off.
If a panel is covered you don't get any power. If part of it is shaded you may not get any power depending on what part is shaded. If you have multiple panels in series, one of the panels in shade will cause problems getting much power as well.Howdy Doug- IIRC you live out East and get a fair amount of snow. I'm in Michigan and I have a couple large portions of my roof facing directly south. How much efficiency is lost to snow covering the panels? I am kind of interested in looking at solar but assumed it would not be cost effective since the roof has snow cover for a good portion of the year. Also, if your system is roof installed, I'm wondering how the cost of removing and reinstalling the system is handled when it's time to replace the roof and how that cost is factored into the overall savings?
Howdy Doug- IIRC you live out East and get a fair amount of snow. I'm in Michigan and I have a couple large portions of my roof facing directly south. How much efficiency is lost to snow covering the panels? I am kind of interested in looking at solar but assumed it would not be cost effective since the roof has snow cover for a good portion of the year. Also, if your system is roof installed, I'm wondering how the cost of removing and reinstalling the system is handled when it's time to replace the roof and how that cost is factored into the overall savings?
If a panel is covered you don't get any power. If part of it is shaded you may not get any power depending on what part is shaded. If you have multiple panels in series, one of the panels in shade will cause problems getting much power as well.
Given you may get batteries in the future what I'm suggesting is make sure the inverter you get now is capable of islanding, as opposed to having to replace it down the track unnecessarily. All my sensitive electronics are on smaller UPS units, but I wouldn't hesitate to run while grid is down without house batteries if I did have solar. With 10kw of panels you'll prob be good for about 8kw in full sun? Not sure how sophisticated the setup will be but seems like you could set the ac breaker to load shed first and leave the critical house loads up? Or leave the AC unit without backup power - as it seems a waste to use battery power to power a high demand load like that.Unless I haven't found the right info, my understanding is without a decent bank of batteries in an AC-coupled config, running a house purely off PV panels is not a good idea during a grid-outage. Having a battery setup to regulate the islanded PV power generation is the safest way so that my electronics are not damaged if they draw more power than the panel inverters can deliver when there is an immediate demand, say like when an AC compressor kicks on or something. I realize there are a few devices to give a limited amount of power (1500-3000W) during grid-outages but to do this right and have a hybrid grid-tied system that also works when the power is off works best when you have batteries to regulate the voltage via a grid-tied battery backup config. I'm not looking to spend money on a battery backup system. Maybe down the road I will consider something like this and I can make the necessary changes to implement that feature.
If you know of a power optimizer inverter that can run perfect without batteries when the grid is down please let me know and I'll read up on it. I'm just not aware of one except for the devices I mentioned earlier that will give limited amounts of power for emergency devices in the range of 1500W-3000W.
I must be in the 1% of people that does not expect my house to have power when the grid is down even though I'll have PV panels.