Nvidia’s GTX 1080 and GTX 1070 revealed: Faster than Titan X at half the price

I just want two for a really fast gaming experience.

Ddrueding: "WHERE'S THE WALLET!!! HURRY!"

Ddrueding's wife: "David, what's going on? Why are you shouting and so agitated?"

Ddrueding: "I NEED THE CREDIT CARD, NOW! IT'S A LIFE OR DEATH MATTER."

Ddureding's wife: "What happened? What's the emergency?"

Ddrueding: "I MUST GET TWO NEW GRAPHIC CARDS AND I HAVE TO START GAMING RIGHT FUCKING NOW!"
 
Ddrueding: "WHERE'S THE WALLET!!! HURRY!"

Ddrueding's wife: "David, what's going on? Why are you shouting and so agitated?"

Ddrueding: "I NEED THE CREDIT CARD, NOW! IT'S A LIFE OR DEATH MATTER."

Ddureding's wife: "What happened? What's the emergency?"

Ddrueding: "I MUST GET TWO NEW GRAPHIC CARDS AND I HAVE TO START GAMING RIGHT FUCKING NOW!"

:salut: :rofl:
 
I had a video card with a fan once and the fan slowed down after a few years, cooking it. Since then I try to avoid the fans.
Are we simply doomed by the inefficiency of the semiconductors?
Sort of how I feel but nowadays integrated graphics are fine for the vast majority of users. I would imagine if we designed cases and motherboards so the heat-generating components could be connected to a huge, passive heat sink on back of the case we wouldn't need fans.
 
Wasn't that much of a hurry, it was nearly 30 hours from me noticing they were for sale and failing to purchase them. ;)
They were available for sale a lot earlier than that. People (not reviewers) got their cards earlier in the week already.
 
Oh well. I'll keep what fanless thing I have for now, but my monitor is really dying out.
It's looking like I would have to get a 2560 x 1440 and see it there is some way to cut off the sides.
 
It's looking like I would have to get a 2560 x 1440 and see it there is some way to cut off the sides.

If you can live with a 24" monitor, HP has already taken care of cuting off the sides for you : Z24nq.

In short :
  • 2560x1440
  • IPS
  • 8ms response time
  • HDMI, miniDP, DP, DVI, and a USB 3.0 hub
  • factory-calibrated RGB color

300$ at the moment.
 
If you can live with a 24" monitor, HP has already taken care of cuting off the sides for you : Z24nq.

In short :
  • 2560x1440
  • IPS
  • 8ms response time
  • HDMI, miniDP, DP, DVI, and a USB 3.0 hub
  • factory-calibrated RGB color

300$ at the moment.

No, I mean reducing the width compared to the height. The 16:9 is awful for viewing. I'd like to make the edges black.
 
These problems would go away if they'd just make at least a few 5:4 or 4:3 panels.

Squarish panels nowadays are almost always reserved for special purposes like medical or aerospace. Typically costs are very high and they are not necessarily good for photos.
 
Rotate 90-degrees. Problem more than solved ;)

No, that's even worse. I'd like about 2:3. My 5:8 display is as short as I can handle.
Do the fancy video cards allow for any image size you want or is a hacker needed to do that?
 
To get what (I think) you are after will require two things.

1. The monitor to support a "1:1" mode, where it doesn't try to stretch or scale the image to fill the screen.
2. A video card capable of displaying the resolution you want. Most will do this, but finding where in their driver to add a custom resolution might take a quick internet search.
 
Back
Top