PC Gaming = World of Suck

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,522
Location
Horsens, Denmark
There is only one console-based annoyance (tab to cancel, enter to accept) but less than an hour in that was the new instinct anyway. I understand the principle of the argument, but I can let it slide this time.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
Sadly, you don't really know how much the graphics engine was retarded by the fact that it had to run on PS3s and Xboxes.
 

Handruin

Administrator
Joined
Jan 13, 2002
Messages
13,741
Location
USA
The one thing I've really begun to understand about a lot of the very large corporations, is that they no longer care about customer service, but rather grabbing/siphoning as much income from the consumer as possible in the shortest amount of time.

The number of retailers whose customer service policies now seem completely anti-consumer orientated is unbelievable. In some respects most are really pushing the consumer laws to the limits...

In there view, if they didn't need to deal with customers at all, they wouldn't bother, except they need to, as it's the customers giving them the $.

I can't say much for gaming these days, as I haven't actively purchased a game in nearly 4 years, but what I've read about DRM, account lockouts, etc., I'd rather browse the net looking for free and/or open source stuff first, even if it means I would have to compile the game myself, before giving some mega-corp like EA a cent of my income.

I guess this is another reason why the Indie scene is picking up again... (not taking into account that EA, etc are laying off staff left, right and center). People are sick of dealing with the mega-corp paying $50+ for a game, when they can get an Indie game for $10, or start looking at some of the free/opensource stuff coming out now...

I agree that this is a big problem that's only getting worse. There are still a few smaller folks who seem to care about the customers. There was an article yesterday about GoG who actually listens to its customers in hopes to trade some inconvenience for information safety.
 

Sol

Storage is cool
Joined
Feb 10, 2002
Messages
960
Location
Cardiff (Wales)
The controls in Skyrim take a huge hit from the consoles. They are, in a word, dire. There are already some mods which start to fix the issues so hopefully they'll all get sorted. It's pretty sad though that the last 2 Elder Scrolls games both had better controls. (As did Fallout 3)

That said Skyrim is still a great game, and is a step up from Oblivion in terms of open world awesomeness. But then I thought Fallout 3 was still a great game.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,522
Location
Horsens, Denmark
Sadly, you don't really know how much the graphics engine was retarded by the fact that it had to run on PS3s and Xboxes.

Apparently. 2560x1440 with everything maxed is very playable on Home1, and the view distance is long enough to allow ridiculous sniping with arrows if you feel like it. Could it be better? Sure, but it isn't bad. Is there a decent article on the subject?
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
As a clarification: How much do you think the game engine was held back by the fact that it still has to work on texture memory and feature-limited platforms?
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
But then I thought Fallout 3 was still a great game.

I think Fallout 3 suffered from its association with games that are truly great. On its own, it's a good enough title with some modest nagging down sides. Unfortunately, I had expectations of getting another Fallout game, something that mixed in trademark humor and the ability to perform a wide variety of off-the-wall activities. Fallout 3 is grim and brown and brown and grim. It's a more-or-less a first person shooter with the occasional interspersed conversation. That's not Fallout.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,522
Location
Horsens, Denmark
As a clarification: How much do you think the game engine was held back by the fact that it still has to work on texture memory and feature-limited platforms?

There are quite a few elements to that question. Could it have been prettier with my hardware? Yes. Is it prettier on my PC than it is on a console due to some graphics settings and higher resolution? Yes. Could they have squeezed better graphics without substantially adding to the development costs by abandoning the console market? Did they instead redirect the additional graphical costs into content?

It could have been much prettier, but it is pretty, and it is a good game.
 

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,726
Location
Québec, Québec
I noticed today that Serious Sam 3 is 35.99$ on pre-orders. That's quite cheap for a game that's pretty much certain to be a hit for the fans of the series (like me).
From Ars Technica's review :
If you have a deep love of classical first-person shooters or enjoy games that deliver pure action, it doesn't get much better than this, especially with the wealth of options offered for play. You can save at any time, and you'll want to use that option if you'd like to get ahead. Some players are going to be turned off by the difficulty or the game's simple design, but even more are going to fall in love with a developer's mastery of this genre. Welcome back Sam. We missed you.

Verdict: Buy
At least that's one classic that did not disapoint.

Somewhere in the review, he warns gamers that the level of difficulty might become frustrating at times. He's right : I punched my Dell U2410 and it's now unrecoverable. It took me three punch to kill my previous Dell FP2005, but I managed to break the glass of my U2410 on my very first loss of control. 400$ in the garbage, oh well.

The game is still a lot of fun.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
There are quite a few elements to that question. Could it have been prettier with my hardware? Yes. Is it prettier on my PC than it is on a console due to some graphics settings and higher resolution? Yes.

I suppose there's some kind of analogy between the average gaming PC and some kind of 16-cylinder, 2000 horsepower engine (that's a thing, right?) in a car that has to drive 60mph and no faster because that's as fast as Chevettes go.

There are vanishingly few things that can upper-tier cards, even cards that are three generations old, really break a sweat, and that's because everything that's done has to work on consoles too.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,522
Location
Horsens, Denmark
I can see that, and I would love to have maximum eye-candy, but I can't see it being a decent business proposition. How many rigs like ours are out there? Enough to fund a top-end game?
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
We used to be able to count on id, Epic or, hey, Crotean, to deliver showpiece 3D engines for PC games. The market for PC games has gotten bigger in the years since, not smaller. It shouldn't be THAT hard to get one out the door.
 

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,726
Location
Québec, Québec
There are several games that require rigs like your to get fluid gameplay when enabling all the visual effects. Crysis 1&2, Metro 2033, Lost Planet, Aliens vs Predators, Rage and certainly some others.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent

And well he should. id games are largely tech demos but it sucks that their next gen toolkit is built in that way.

Coug, man, don't blame your monitor for what are clearly your desktop's failings. Kick the tower, not the screen. Also, switch to nice, thick Supermicro chassis. Since I use a pedastal server case for a stepstool, I'm pretty sure they can take a few kicks. :)
 

Handruin

Administrator
Joined
Jan 13, 2002
Messages
13,741
Location
USA
From Ars Technica's review :

At least that's one classic that did not disapoint.

Somewhere in the review, he warns gamers that the level of difficulty might become frustrating at times. He's right : I punched my Dell U2410 and it's now unrecoverable. It took me three punch to kill my previous Dell FP2005, but I managed to break the glass of my U2410 on my very first loss of control. 400$ in the garbage, oh well.

The game is still a lot of fun.

Sounds like roid rage. You might want to get some help with that, it's sounding costly. Got any pics to backup the carnage claim? I can't imagine it would take much to break a U2410, so I'm not that impressed. I'm sure I could take mine out with a single hit also. You should have a glass CRT if you want it to withstand some dirty punches. Then I'd be impressed if you were able to break it by punching.
 

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,726
Location
Québec, Québec
I won't punch a CRT because the implosion might send fragments and seriously injure me. Plus the several thousand volts applied on the tube...

I only have a webcam to take pictures. I gave it a punch and when I saw I killed it, I decide to take a hammer for another two hits. Now there are bits of glass/plastic everywhere in the room.
 

LiamC

Storage Is My Life
Joined
Feb 7, 2002
Messages
2,016
Location
Canberra
My son bought me Duke for my birthday. I just installed it. Yeah it's old skool, yeah it doesn't have the realism, or accuracy of MW3 or BF3. It doesn't require a 990X overclocked to 4.5GHz and a Radeon 6990 to play at medium settings. It's cartoonish. And has a lot of toilet humour. But damn if it isn't fun for the odd 30 minute or one hour session. I think all of those people who gave it a bad rap missed the point.
 

MaxBurn

Storage Is My Life
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
3,245
Location
SC
The people that wanted it were expecting something a little more hardcore than a popcap game tourist experience.
 

Sol

Storage is cool
Joined
Feb 10, 2002
Messages
960
Location
Cardiff (Wales)
My son bought me Duke for my birthday. I just installed it. Yeah it's old skool, yeah it doesn't have the realism, or accuracy of MW3 or BF3. It doesn't require a 990X overclocked to 4.5GHz and a Radeon 6990 to play at medium settings. It's cartoonish. And has a lot of toilet humour. But damn if it isn't fun for the odd 30 minute or one hour session. I think all of those people who gave it a bad rap missed the point.

I think a lot of the people who didn't like it, myself included, would disagree about the humor. But it has a lot of toilet.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
I'd just like to say that while browsing torrents the other night I found a Duke Nukem porn parody. I suspect it's more interesting than the game you guys are are talking about, but I couldn't be bothered to download it and find out.
 

Handruin

Administrator
Joined
Jan 13, 2002
Messages
13,741
Location
USA
I ended up buying the new duke nukem forever over the holidays for $4.99. I still haven't installed it yet. At that price it was worth seeing how bad it is.
 

LiamC

Storage Is My Life
Joined
Feb 7, 2002
Messages
2,016
Location
Canberra
Tropico 4 has got me hooked at the mo. There's just something about being a dictator that appeals... :)
 

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,726
Location
Québec, Québec
I'd like to find a Zuma-like free game for a customer. Is there any, except for the online-only versions? Someone told me there's another version with a bug instead of a toad, but it's very similar.

The customer likes stupid and simple computer games. I've seen this one on several computers I've repaired and I thought it should please him.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
My local Walmart has a boxed set called "Popcap's Greatest Hits." It sells for about $15 and includes Bejeweled and Zuma. I bought five copies of it with the idea that I will give them to 60 year old divorcees who keep bringing me their PCs that are full of spyware from the shifty online game sites they visit.

60 year old divorced women should absolutely be the new stereotype for gamers.
 

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,726
Location
Québec, Québec
Someone I know would like to play Skyrim on his low profile computer. The enclosure is an Antec Minuet 350 and he loves it because it is virtually silent. There's no space on his desk for anything else than a small form factor enclosure. Even a shoebox like a Silverstone SG05 wouldn't fit.

The fastest low profile graphic cards I can find are a GeForce 450GTS and a Radeon HD 6750, both with 1GB of DDR5 RAM. I know there's also a Radeon HD 6850 made by a company named AFOX, but it's nowhere to be found around here. With the power supply in the Minuet 350, the only option must be the LP Radeon 6750 as the GeForce 450GTS needs more juice and I'm not sure the 12V rail would appreciate this in the long run.

Assuming the CPU isn't the limiting factor (he currently has a Core 2 Quad Q9650, but it could be easily replaced with a Core i5 if needed), is it possible to play Skyrim at 1920x1080 on a Radeon HD 6750? Reviews on the Net tend to tell me that it's not, at least with a good level of details and an acceptable frame rate, but I haven't played the PC version of the game (or any other for that matter) so I cannot confirm.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
Youtube has a video of 1080p gameplay. I looks acceptable to me. The 6750 is just a touch slower than the Radeon 6770, and those are generally pretty capable for midrange hardware.
 

Striker

Learning Storage Performance
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
269
I play it at High setting on a 4870 at 1920x1080 and my processor is much slower.
 

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,726
Location
Québec, Québec
Thanks for the feedback. I've looked at the youtube video of Skyrim's gameplay at 1080p on a Radeon HD 5770 and while it was generally good, there was at least one instance when it was choppy (during a fight).

I think a Radeon HD 4870 is a more powerful card than a Radeon HD 6750. One generation older, but more pipelines and RAM bandwidth IIRC.

If only AMD and Nvidia could move their asses and offer newer cards in the 100$-130$ segment. AMD will still offer the same two, if not three years old rebranded Radeon HD 5750/70 with their Radeon HD 76xx and Nvidia has nothing else than their GeForce GTS 450 or anemic GeForce 550Ti. It's quite stagnant.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,594
Location
I am omnipresent
I've been recommending Radeon *770 cards for mainstream gaming for years. It's nice that they're consistent enough in their naming that the capabilities continue to match up to that.

Your customer should be fully aware that his system precludes high-end gaming. Get him the card he can get and let him game if that's what he wants to do.
 

DrunkenBastard

Storage is cool
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
775
Location
on the floor
Thanks for the feedback. I've looked at the youtube video of Skyrim's gameplay at 1080p on a Radeon HD 5770 and while it was generally good, there was at least one instance when it was choppy (during a fight).

I think a Radeon HD 4870 is a more powerful card than a Radeon HD 6750. One generation older, but more pipelines and RAM bandwidth IIRC.

If only AMD and Nvidia could move their asses and offer newer cards in the 100$-130$ segment. AMD will still offer the same two, if not three years old rebranded Radeon HD 5750/70 with their Radeon HD 76xx and Nvidia has nothing else than their GeForce GTS 450 or anemic GeForce 550Ti. It's quite stagnant.

The AMD 7750 should be around the $140 mark (which should cause further downward pricing pressure on the 6770 range).

http://news.techeye.net/chips/amd-hd-7770-details-leaked
 

CougTek

Hairy Aussie
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
8,726
Location
Québec, Québec
Ok, looking at all the benchmarks, the 7750 actually beats the 6770 slightly, but not in a way the user will notice. It's similar performance for the same price. To the customer's eyes, nothing changed except the number on the box. Disappointing.
 
Top