ddrueding
Fixture
There is only one console-based annoyance (tab to cancel, enter to accept) but less than an hour in that was the new instinct anyway. I understand the principle of the argument, but I can let it slide this time.
The one thing I've really begun to understand about a lot of the very large corporations, is that they no longer care about customer service, but rather grabbing/siphoning as much income from the consumer as possible in the shortest amount of time.
The number of retailers whose customer service policies now seem completely anti-consumer orientated is unbelievable. In some respects most are really pushing the consumer laws to the limits...
In there view, if they didn't need to deal with customers at all, they wouldn't bother, except they need to, as it's the customers giving them the $.
I can't say much for gaming these days, as I haven't actively purchased a game in nearly 4 years, but what I've read about DRM, account lockouts, etc., I'd rather browse the net looking for free and/or open source stuff first, even if it means I would have to compile the game myself, before giving some mega-corp like EA a cent of my income.
I guess this is another reason why the Indie scene is picking up again... (not taking into account that EA, etc are laying off staff left, right and center). People are sick of dealing with the mega-corp paying $50+ for a game, when they can get an Indie game for $10, or start looking at some of the free/opensource stuff coming out now...
Sadly, you don't really know how much the graphics engine was retarded by the fact that it had to run on PS3s and Xboxes.
But then I thought Fallout 3 was still a great game.
As a clarification: How much do you think the game engine was held back by the fact that it still has to work on texture memory and feature-limited platforms?
From Ars Technica's review :I noticed today that Serious Sam 3 is 35.99$ on pre-orders. That's quite cheap for a game that's pretty much certain to be a hit for the fans of the series (like me).
At least that's one classic that did not disapoint.If you have a deep love of classical first-person shooters or enjoy games that deliver pure action, it doesn't get much better than this, especially with the wealth of options offered for play. You can save at any time, and you'll want to use that option if you'd like to get ahead. Some players are going to be turned off by the difficulty or the game's simple design, but even more are going to fall in love with a developer's mastery of this genre. Welcome back Sam. We missed you.
Verdict: Buy
There are quite a few elements to that question. Could it have been prettier with my hardware? Yes. Is it prettier on my PC than it is on a console due to some graphics settings and higher resolution? Yes.
As I understand it, Rage has a bad case of Consoleportitis.
At least Carmack apologised for this...
http://www.firingsquad.com/news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=23760
From Ars Technica's review :
At least that's one classic that did not disapoint.
Somewhere in the review, he warns gamers that the level of difficulty might become frustrating at times. He's right : I punched my Dell U2410 and it's now unrecoverable. It took me three punch to kill my previous Dell FP2005, but I managed to break the glass of my U2410 on my very first loss of control. 400$ in the garbage, oh well.
The game is still a lot of fun.
My son bought me Duke for my birthday. I just installed it. Yeah it's old skool, yeah it doesn't have the realism, or accuracy of MW3 or BF3. It doesn't require a 990X overclocked to 4.5GHz and a Radeon 6990 to play at medium settings. It's cartoonish. And has a lot of toilet humour. But damn if it isn't fun for the odd 30 minute or one hour session. I think all of those people who gave it a bad rap missed the point.
60 year old divorced women should absolutely be the new stereotype for gamers.
The last hardcore gamers rig I built was for someone well over 60. She ran a WoW clan.
Thanks for the feedback. I've looked at the youtube video of Skyrim's gameplay at 1080p on a Radeon HD 5770 and while it was generally good, there was at least one instance when it was choppy (during a fight).
I think a Radeon HD 4870 is a more powerful card than a Radeon HD 6750. One generation older, but more pipelines and RAM bandwidth IIRC.
If only AMD and Nvidia could move their asses and offer newer cards in the 100$-130$ segment. AMD will still offer the same two, if not three years old rebranded Radeon HD 5750/70 with their Radeon HD 76xx and Nvidia has nothing else than their GeForce GTS 450 or anemic GeForce 550Ti. It's quite stagnant.