Samsung 990 Pro

Handruin

Administrator
Joined
Jan 13, 2002
Messages
13,802
Location
USA
Just in time for new consumer systems to adopt pcie5. Does sound nice and fast and I'd like a 4TB
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,998
Location
USA
I'd stripe 2-3 of them. Does the TLC flash achieve anywhere near the PCIe 4 interface speed after the buffer is exhausted in a few seconds?
I've found the current drives are crapping out well below 2000MB/sec. sustained writes, basically not better than the old MLC 970 Pro. I think enterprise grade U2 or other interfaces are needed to sustain high writes.
 

Handruin

Administrator
Joined
Jan 13, 2002
Messages
13,802
Location
USA
According to Samsung's marketing in the link you posted it gets pretty close to the PCIe4 limit but to your point, this could be a burst speed versus sustained. We'll have to wait and see what the in-depth reviews come up.

PCIe 4.0’s highest theoretical sequential read speed is 8000 MB/s — 990 PRO reaches 7,450 MB/s as of Q3 2022.

The U.2 is just the physical interface, it doesn't offer any more theoretical bandwidth when compared to M.2 since it's just the connecting physical interface to PCIe bus where the same NVMe protocol comes into the picture. Those enterprise drives just tend to have larger amounts of over-provisioning NAND, better controllers, and maybe more onboard RAM with power loss protection.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,998
Location
USA
Yes of course they are better due to the enterprise needs. I also suspect that the capability of using a lot more power due to the connectors and dissipation from metal enclosures makes a difference.
Sustained writes are always a problem for me. The trend lately is for many SSDs to be slower than the previous ones. It's sneaky and a type of manufacturing cost reduction. Hiding behind the pseudo-SLC buffer does no good when you need to move a TB or two to the SSD and it slows down. Only a few websites test SSDs in the dirty state where the sustainable writes are shown.
 

Handruin

Administrator
Joined
Jan 13, 2002
Messages
13,802
Location
USA
This might be a use case where you consider an enterprise level SSD to help meet your performance needs. You can get adapters to convert U.2 to PCIe or M.2 slots and use a 2.5" SSD. I do this in a couple of my systems right now.

Another alternative is to buy one of these newer 990 Pro when it comes out and test it yourself. If it sucks, return it. :)

When we qualify enterprise SSDs at work, we pre-fill them with random non-compressible data before beating on them with FIO utility. We had the same concerns with sustained performance when the drive has been filled and we perform a lot of writes. Since getting true random data from linux under /dev/urandom can be painfully slow, we leveraged this neat trick to use openssl to assist when generating lots of random data quickly.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,998
Location
USA
I tried that a couple of years ago with the 4510 or something. It was dead in like 3 weeks. I'm not sure if it was the M.2 adapter or what, but $1000 lost and I was done with that experiment.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,836
Location
I am omnipresent
I use Intel P4500s for continuous backup and database dumps. They are TLC drives that top out at around 3GB/sec writes but they're affordable and use a convenient 2.5" form factor. I'm sure I have at least a few dozen in service. They've all been extremely well behaved.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,998
Location
USA
I don't have bandwidth for video here, maybe next week in the capital. What is the issue, just not meeting write specs?
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,836
Location
I am omnipresent
They're supposed to be TLC NAND but it wouldn't surprise me of they are actually QLC with a TLC or MLC cache. They're also only good for .3 DWPD, which is half what the truly MLC 860 Pro supported, even in the same capacity, or against the .75 DWPD TLC in Intel P4500s.
That suggests there is fuckery afoot.

I was using Samsung Pro drives specifically for longevity and I'd be screaming bloody murder if that's what they're calling "Pro" now.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,998
Location
USA
Reported health of the drives dropping significantly with very little usage.
I'm literally on EDGE according to phone and 9000ft. Every 50m up or down creates LOS.

It looks like maybe the Firmware is whacky or the drives just suck. The SN850X are fine stripped and I feel no need to use Samsung.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,998
Location
USA
Top