Mercutio
Fatwah on Western Digital
I'd still take OCZ. Nothing can beat WD's 13 RMAs for 9 drives in one year record.
I'd still take OCZ. Nothing can beat WD's 13 RMAs for 9 drives in one year record.
AFAIK, Kingston has nine series of SSDs. Only the SNE-125 and SNM225 are rebadged Intel drives. The others have Toshiba controllers and are slower. The SNM225 (Intel X-M drive) are listed has being discontinued.Aren't the Kingston drives rebadged Intel X-25s?
I don't trust that highly compressible data claim.
Maybe you'd prefer Micron's C400 then.Yeah, and they won't have a good firmware for a few months after that. Anyway, I'm skeptical that it will be that much faster. I don't trust that highly compressible data claim.
The dirty little secret is that as flash process shrinks the number of times you can reprogram the chip drops. So, as it gets faster and cheaper it also gets less reliable / durable.
I think that's the crux of the Sandforce controller versus Micron flash difference.The dirty little secret is that as flash process shrinks the number of times you can reprogram the chip drops. So, as it gets faster and cheaper it also gets less reliable / durable.
The next Sandy Bridge chipset/Intel storage driver revision looks like it may have an interesting trick up it's sleeve... SSD caching. I wonder how relevant the Seagate Momentus XT will be after that ships? (assuming it's true...)
Looks like Marvell was not the only ones thinking ahead. I think it makes total sense. The Momentus may only be relevant for laptops and other single drive systems in the future.
2CV102M3 This firmware revision fixes enumeration and slow-boot issues on SATA 6Gb/s
controllers, adds improvements to S.M.A.R.T. attributes for more accurate
reporting of drive health, improves NCQ capability, and fixes possible drive
hangs when reading S.M.A.R.T. self-test log.
I'll give it a month or two before I try it.Has anyone tried it yet? After 26 months I figure it is not worth fixing what is not broken.