X58 is the only or best chipset, right? So all the boards would be failry similar.
XP64 I've tested with up to 36GB of RAM.
I mostly build budget systems for small businesses or basic consumer PCs, Lunar.
So this is still the only really good CPU choice?
If you want really fast, that is head and shoulders ahead of the rest. I still haven't sprung for one, though.
What about the i7 970? 3.2 vs 3.33 GHz, and locked, but $120 less.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115066&cm_re=i7_970-_-19-115-066-_-Product
Perhaps Q1 2011 will be nice time to build a new system, with both Sandybridge and the new Intel X25-Ms (http://www.anandtech.com/show/3965/intels-3rd-generation-x25m-ssd-specs-revealed). Are there other SSDs slated to be rolled out around Q1 2011 that will offer similar priceerformance?
Regardless, the thing to understand about SSDs is that you're getting a staggering benefit just from having a decent one. Personally, I'm not interested in performance. Just being an SSD with a good controller is good enough performance. Hell, it's a game-changer. What I'm more interested in is higher capacity and lower price.
I experienced that staggering benefit of the X25-E almost two years ago. It is high time for a better one. :santa:
The difference in cost between the two monitors is almost $1000. The specs are the same except for the built-in calibrator.
In my experience, nothing is more important than the monitor, keyboard, and mouse (in that order). After that, any good SSD, lots'o'RAM, and a good CPU.
Yeah, not worth it. How often do you calibrate your screen? Will you be able to get the same quality display using an external calibration device?